Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-16
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The plans below show the site of a farm in 1950 and the same site today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
THE MAPS ILLUSTRATE CHANGES OF THE BEECHWOOD FARM FROM 1950 TO PRESENT YEAR.
FIRSTLY, IN NORTH-EAST CORNER THERE WAS A SHEEP YARD AREA IN 1950. WHICH WERE CONVERTED IN TO THE FEW DEVELOPMENTS SUCH AS CAMPING FIELD, PARKING SLOT WHICH IS CONNECT TO THE MAIN ROAD TO THE HIGH WAY AND SOLAR PANELS AREA WITH EAST SIDE FACING PARKING. MOREOVER, IN THE CENTER OF THE FARM THERE WERE TRACK WHICH WAS STARTED FROM THE EAST SIDE AND PASS THROGHT THE CENTER OF THE FARM AND MOVE TOWARDS NORTH-WEST DIRECTION. THAT TRACK CONSTRUCTED IN TO THE ROAD.
MOVE TOWARDS THE FURTURE INFORMATION, IN THE 1950 THERE WERE BARN, FARMHOUSE AND CHICKEN AREA LOCATED IN THE SOUTH-WEST CORENER WHICH IS DELVELOPED AND CONVERTED INTO THE HOLIDAY COTTAGE INSTED OF BARM. THE BARN AREA TRASFRED INTO THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE FARM WHICH IS CONNECTED WITH TWO SIDE OF THE ROAD . IN ADDITION, BESIDE THE SOFT FRUITS AREA, THERE WAS ONE FRUIT TRESS FARM LOCATED IN THE YEAR 1950. NOWADAYS, THERE IS ONE FARM SHOP CONSTRUCTED IN CORNER OF THE HIGHWAY AS WELLAS MAIN ROAD.
OVERALL, ITCAN BE CLEARLY SEEN THAT, THERE ARE SOME CHANGES IN THE SHEEP, FRUIT TREES AND BARN AREAS. WHIC NOW INTRODUCE SOME NEW EMINITIES AND DEVELOPED THE BEECHWOOD FARM AREA.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response covers the main features of the maps, such as the conversion of the sheep yard into a camping area and the relocation of the barn. However, the description is somewhat disjointed and lacks a clear, analytical overview of the most significant changes. While the key developments are mentioned, the comparison between 1950 and the present is occasionally confusing due to imprecise language (e.g., 'converted in to the few developments'). To reach a higher band, ensure that the overview clearly synthesizes the major trends, such as the shift from agricultural use to tourism-related facilities, rather than just listing individual changes.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The response is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as 'Move towards the furture information' and 'Which were converted in to'. The logical flow between sentences is sometimes hindered by awkward phrasing and grammatical errors, making the progression of ideas feel disjointed. The referencing is occasionally unclear, particularly when describing the movement of the track and the relocation of the barn. Improving the use of linking words and ensuring clear pronoun reference would significantly enhance the coherence of the report.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. There are several spelling errors (e.g., 'throght', 'trasfred', 'eminities', 'tress') and awkward collocations (e.g., 'parking slot', 'fruit trees farm'). The range of vocabulary is limited, relying on basic terms to describe the changes. To improve, you should focus on using more precise terminology related to map descriptions, such as 'transformed', 'replaced', 'extended', or 'demolished', and ensure that spelling is accurate to avoid distracting the reader.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The response contains a mix of simple and some attempted complex structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Issues include incorrect verb tenses (e.g., 'there were track'), subject-verb agreement errors, and awkward sentence construction (e.g., 'Which were converted in to the few developments'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with unnecessary full stops breaking up sentences. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar and sentence structure prevents the response from reaching a higher band. Focusing on sentence boundaries and consistent verb usage is essential.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.