Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-29
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The plans below show the site of a farm in 1950 and the same site today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The map shows illustrate how Beechwood Farm developed between 150.
overall, it is clear that Beechwood Farm experienced significant changes during the given period. Several new facilities were added, while some existing areas were replaced or developed.
In 1950, there was river sheep and tracks located in the given map. However, by passage of time this area will be developed and more modern.
Furthermore, roads and streets remained unchanged, where area , new farm house and tracks were developed. Another significant was the construction of barns near the tracks which is replaced with more feature. The road network was also modified, with tracks being extended, wiedned or relocated. Overall, the area became more developed and modern than before, with improved facilities , better access, and a greater emphasis on Beechwood Farm. Overall, the aera underwent significant changes during given period, with several new facilities and developments being added, making the location more modern, organized, and convenient for visitors
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response attempts to summarize the changes at Beechwood Farm, but it fails to accurately report the specific features shown in the diagrams. The description is vague, using phrases like 'more modern' or 'improved facilities' rather than identifying the specific changes, such as the conversion of the farmhouse into a larger building, the addition of a new road, or the removal of the sheep area. The overview is generic and lacks a clear summary of the most significant trends. Furthermore, the response contains factual inaccuracies, such as claiming the road network remained unchanged while simultaneously stating it was modified. To improve, focus on describing the specific spatial changes clearly.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into short paragraphs, but the logical progression is weak. While there is an attempt to use cohesive devices like 'Furthermore' and 'Overall', these are often used incorrectly or repetitively. The final paragraph is particularly disjointed, repeating the word 'Overall' twice in close proximity. The referencing is sometimes unclear, such as 'this area' without a clear antecedent. The flow of information is hindered by these structural issues, making it difficult for the reader to follow the development of the site over time. Better use of linking words and clearer paragraph structure would improve the coherence significantly.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is limited and repetitive. Words like 'developed', 'modern', and 'changes' are used frequently, which restricts the range of expression. There are also errors in word choice and spelling, such as 'wiedned' (widened) and 'aera' (area). The response lacks the specific terminology required for describing maps or diagrams, such as 'demolished', 'converted', 'extended', or 'constructed'. To reach a higher band, you should aim to use a wider variety of descriptive verbs and nouns that accurately reflect the visual information provided in the task.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The response contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede communication. There are issues with verb tense consistency, such as 'by passage of time this area will be developed', which is inappropriate for a description of past changes. Subject-verb agreement is also problematic, for example, 'The map shows illustrate' and 'Another significant was'. Punctuation is inconsistent, with irregular spacing around commas and periods. While there is an attempt to use complex sentence structures, these are often faulty. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for tense consistency would be a beneficial first step.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.