Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-23

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show the site of a farm in 1950 and the same site today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.



 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The two maps illustrate the how the Beechwood farm has changed since it first design in 1950.

Overall, the farm has undergone significant redevelopment, with many original features being removed or replaced.Solar panels, Camping field ,Parking areas, Holiday cottages, and barn have been added while the fruit trees, soft fruits, vegetables, farmhouse , chickens and river remains unchanged. the notable feature is that roads have been constructed in a new design.

In 1950, the site contains different areas, such as sheep section at northern side, and after crossing the track this area was utilized for barn, farmhouse , chickens just near the bend of a river. near the main road fruit trees are planted, then soft fruits and vegetables consequently. The highway was built at north west corner .

In today's Beechwood farm, many additions have been recorded such as solar panels, 2 parking sheds, and a farm shop. subsequently, the camping field and holiday cottage have beed added. the tracks have been converted to roads.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The student attempts to address the task by describing the changes between the two maps of Beechwood Farm. An overview is provided, though it contains factual inaccuracies; for instance, the student claims that 'the fruit trees, soft fruits, vegetables, farmhouse, chickens and river remains unchanged,' which contradicts the visual data showing new additions like the farm shop, parking areas, and holiday cottages situated in or around those zones. Furthermore, the features are not fully or accurately selected, and the overall summary is weakened by these misreadings. According to the Band 5 descriptor, the response addresses the task only partially and contains inaccuracies in reporting the main features.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response is organized into paragraphs, attempting an introduction, body, and conclusion-like structure. However, the logical progression is weak, and the grouping of information is somewhat confused. For instance, the second body paragraph mixes descriptions from both periods and struggles to sequence details clearly. Cohesive devices are basic and sometimes faulty (e.g., abrupt transitions and missing links). Paragraphing is attempted, but the internal cohesion within paragraphs lacks clear referencing. This aligns well with the Band 5 descriptor for Coherence and Cohesion, where there is some organization but no clear overall progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for a basic description of map features, incorporating terms like 'redevelopment,' 'features,' and 'constructed.' However, there is a limited range of vocabulary, and noticeable errors in word choice occur, such as 'first design' instead of 'first designed' or 'original layout.' There are also issues with pluralization and word forms (e.g., 'holiday cottage' instead of 'holiday cottages' in one instance, and 'beed added' instead of 'been added'). These errors and the restricted lexical variety place the performance at Band 5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but control is inconsistent. There are frequent grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('the fruit trees... remains unchanged'), tense inconsistencies ('the site contains' used when discussing 1950), and spelling/typographical errors ('beed' for 'been', missing capital letters, and awkward punctuation). Complex structures often result in faulty grammar. These frequent errors can cause some difficulty for the reader, fitting the Band 5 descriptors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.