Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show the site of a farm in 1950 and the same site today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.



 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The plans illustrates the changes of beechwood farm in 1950 and the same site today.

It is evident that, there was major shift in farm shown in the currrent picture. In 1950,the river and direction was same but the track changed with road . The major changes was found in sheep area because as per current situation the parking area alloted nearby road and new solar panels also installed or camping field available for all. In the area of chickens and farmhouse , barn was shown . now the barn area reconstruct to buit holiday cottages and barn area shift to two linked road nearby chickens area. The soft fruits and vegetable was unchanged but the little change found in fruit trees area now it also have farm shop.

Overall, the changes in plan was helpfull and new areas was adjusted properly as per plans.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The student attempts to summarise the main changes between the 1950 and current plans of Beechwood Farm. However, the response falls short of the 150-word minimum, containing only 145 words, which negatively impacts the task achievement score. While the student identifies several key developments—such as the addition of the farm shop, solar panels, and holiday cottages—the description is frequently confusing and contains spatial inaccuracies (for instance, misinterpreting the relocation of the barn and the layout of the roads). Furthermore, the overview is extremely brief and superficial. To reach a higher band, the writer must ensure the word count requirement is met, provide a clearer and more comprehensive overview, and describe the spatial transformations with greater precision.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response is divided into brief paragraphs, but the overall logical progression is weak. Cohesive devices are minimal, repetitive, and occasionally unnatural, as seen in phrases like 'It is evident that, there was major shift' and 'In the area of chickens and farmhouse , barn was shown . now the barn area...'. Reference words are sometimes ambiguous, making it difficult to follow the spatial relationships between the various features on the maps. Paragraphing is attempted, but the extreme brevity of the text limits effective structuring. To improve, the student should use a wider variety of cohesive devices to link ideas smoothly and ensure a logical flow from the introduction to the overview and body paragraphs.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The lexical range is limited and repetitive. The student relies heavily on basic vocabulary and direct repetition of terms from the prompt, such as 'farm', 'track', 'road', 'barn', and 'chickens'. There are noticeable word choice and collocation errors, such as 'currrent picture' instead of 'map' or 'plan', and 'buit' (built). While some topic-specific vocabulary is used ('solar panels', 'holiday cottages', 'farm shop'), the overall control of less common lexical items is weak. To achieve a higher band, the student needs to incorporate a wider range of synonyms and precise vocabulary to describe changes, such as 'transformed', 'converted', 'replaced', or 'expanded'.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response displays a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying mostly on simple sentences with frequent structural errors. There are issues with tense consistency and verb forms, such as 'The plans illustrates' (subject-verb agreement error), 'new solar panels also installed or camping field available' (fragmented/ungrammatical clause), and 'the changes in plan was helpfull' (incorrect verb form and spelling). Punctuation errors, such as spaces before commas and periods, are also present. While the meaning can generally be parsed, the high frequency of grammatical inaccuracies restricts the score to a band 5.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.