Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show the site of a farm in 1950 and the same site today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.



 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The two map illustarte the changes that have taken place at beechwoof farm between 1950 and the present day.

Overall, the farm has changed a lot over this period. the main changes are the replacement of the sheep area with a camping field and solar panels, and the addition of new roads, parking areas, a farm shop and holiday cottages. However, some agricultural areas have remained.

In 1950, there was a large sheep field in the northern part of the farm. There were also area for fruit trees, soft fruits and vagetables in the western and south-east, near the farmhouse and chicken area. There were several tracks connecting different parts of the farm. a river an along the southern and western sides.

Today, the shep field have been replaced by a camping field, while solar panels have been installed in the northern-east. A farm shop and parking area have also been added near the fruit trees. The areas for soft fruits and vagetables are still present.

In addition, the old tracks have been changed into roads, and another parking area has been built. Holiday cottages have been cunstructed next to the farmhouse. The barn and the chicken area have remained in the south-east.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response successfully addresses all parts of the task by reporting the main features and making relevant comparisons between the two maps of Beechwood Farm. The overview clearly highlights the major transformation from an agricultural sheep farm to a multi-purpose site featuring leisure amenities like camping and holiday cottages alongside retained agricultural areas. Key details, such as the replacement of the sheep field with a camping ground and the addition of solar panels, a farm shop, and parking areas, are accurately reported and supported with spatial references. While the progression and comparisons are well-selected, some areas are slightly more developed than others, which prevents the response from reaching the highest bands. Overall, the content fully satisfies the requirements for a clear, well-supported summary of visual data.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response demonstrates a clear overall progression and logical organisation throughout, moving successfully from an introductory statement and overview to detailed descriptions of the past and present layouts, followed by infrastructural changes. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate thematic elements. Cohesive devices are generally well handled, with clear markers such as 'In 1950', 'Today', and 'In addition' guiding the reader through the comparison. However, cohesion occasionally feels slightly mechanical or formulaic, and referencing could be smoother in places. To reach a higher band, the transitions between sentences could employ a more sophisticated variety of cohesive links rather than relying on standard time markers, establishing a more seamless flow of information.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, successfully conveying the key changes such as 'replacement', 'solar panels', 'holiday cottages', and 'agricultural areas'. However, the lexical range is somewhat limited, and there are several spelling and word choice inaccuracies throughout the text, including 'illustarte' instead of illustrate, 'beechwoof' instead of Beechwood, 'area' instead of areas, 'vagetables' instead of vegetables, 'shep' instead of sheep, 'northern-east' instead of north-east, and 'cunstructed' instead of constructed. While these minor slips and spelling errors do not impede communication, they reflect a limited control over less common lexical items. To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to incorporate a wider and more precise range of vocabulary with accurate spelling and natural collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response shows a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating attempts at descriptive structures such as passive voice ('have been replaced', 'have been installed') and prepositional phrases. However, there are noticeable grammatical and punctuation errors, including capitalization slips at the beginning of sentences ('Overall, the farm...', 'the main changes...', 'a river an along...'), subject-verb agreement issues like 'the shep field have been replaced', and missing articles ('there were also area'). These errors occur frequently enough to impact the overall control of grammar, though they rarely impede the reader's understanding. To reach a higher band, the writer must produce a greater proportion of error-free sentences and demonstrate tighter control over article usage and subject-verb agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.