Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, primary and secondary schools close for two months or more in the summer holidays.

What is the value of long school holidays?

What are the arguments in favour of shorter school holidays?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In numerous countries, schools are closed for two or more than months during summer holidays.This essay will explain why long holidays are valueable and shorter holidays are preferable by each individual.

Long holidays help students in relaxing and spend time with their families or find other things to do.Students for many months concentrates only on studies, so a long break helps them recover and avoid a burnout.for example, in my country many students use the summer holidays to learn new skills like computer courses or do an outdoor activity like attending a summer camp or visiting realtives which builds their confidence and independence.

However, there are several arguments being made against the long holidays and many people called out for the summer holidays to be shorter.Students often forget much of what they have learned during a long break,so teachers must spend weeks revising the course when school restarts.Another major problem created by long holidays is for parents to invest their time and money on their children for extra curicullar activities like attending a summer camp or enrollling their child for new skills, which many parents can't afford to do, this create a large hole between wealthy and poor students educational performance.For instance many students likes to watch Television during long summer breaks instead of learning.

In conclusion, long breaks give children a good amount of rest and new experiences, but shorter breaks could help learning loss and help families.A balanced system with several shorter breaks throughout the may be the best solution.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both questions and present a relevant contrast: long holidays allow rest, family time and new experiences, while shorter breaks may reduce learning loss and pressure on parents. The examples of summer courses, camps and students watching television help make the discussion concrete. However, the value of long holidays is developed more fully than the case for shorter holidays, and some points need clearer explanation. For example, the claim that parents must invest time and money in activities is relevant, but the link between this burden and shorter holidays could be explained more directly. Your conclusion proposes several shorter breaks, which gives a clear response, though the recommendation would be stronger if you explained why this arrangement balances the benefits you discussed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two sides, and a conclusion. The contrastive opening of the second body paragraph (“However”) and the concluding summary help readers follow the argument. Within paragraphs, ideas generally progress from a main point to an explanation or example. At times, though, connections are mechanical or unclear. The sentence about parents’ costs combines several ideas, making the relationship between affordability, activities and educational performance difficult to follow. Some transitions between claims could also be more explicit, and the conclusion’s final recommendation appears without much preparation in the body. Use clearer sentence boundaries and develop each paragraph around a more focused sequence of points.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of vocabulary, including “recover,” “confidence and independence,” “revising the course,” and “educational performance.” These choices help express the main ideas, and the meaning is generally understandable. However, several word-choice, collocation and spelling problems reduce precision: “holidays are valueable,” “avoid a burnout,” “called out for,” and “a large hole between wealthy and poor students” are not natural in this context. There are also spelling errors such as “realtives,” “curicullar” and “enrollling.” Aim to learn common academic collocations and check spelling carefully. More precise terms for learning loss, family costs and unequal outcomes would make the argument clearer and more controlled.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including explanations with “so” and a relative clause in “activities … which many parents can’t afford.” The overall meaning is usually clear, but some grammatical errors occur in sentence construction, agreement and punctuation. For example, “Students for many months concentrates” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “this create a large hole” also has incorrect agreement. The opening phrase “two or more than months” is not grammatically formed, and several sentences run together without spaces or appropriate punctuation. Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and verb, and divide long sentences when they contain several linked claims. This will improve accuracy while preserving your attempts at complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.