Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-24
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries, primary and secondary schools close for two months or more in the summer holidays.
What is the value of long school holidays?
What are the arguments in favour of shorter school holidays?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In significant number of countries, Primary and Secondary schools are giving vications to sudents for two months or more in summer holidays. It has numerous benefits for the students, they could able to learn many new skills like communicating skills, how to manage finance and many others, while other argues that, if student will disconnected with their studies that will affect on their grades. Moreover, there two perspective regarding to vications, furthermore, we will discuss both precpective in details in this essay.
To begin with, a significant proportion of population believe that long term vications have considerable benefits for students career, just like they could able to do some kind of part time jobs, through that they can able to earn some money plus one important thing is that, although they can able to learn many skills such as communicating skills, managing finance and how to deal costomers. consequently, they already have knowldge about real world. In addition, in many developed countries students have to work in vications.
In contrast, other argues that, if students are disconnected with their studies then their results and grades will be affected. According to them if students do not get good grades in their studies, he will not able to get good a good job in the surroundings. Although mostly the envirnment juge a student capabilities by their grades. However, in this day and age, grades are not enough because these days skills matters alot.
In conclusion, there are considerable benefits of log term vications because these play a vital role in student life through vications they might able to learn skill plus earn some money. that's why I am in the favour of log term viccation. Although every single students in this wold is in favour to log term vication.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The response addresses both parts of the prompt, discussing the value of long holidays (learning communication and financial skills, part-time jobs) and the arguments for shorter holidays (impact on grades and future employment). However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. Expressions such as 'in significant number of countries' and 'furthermore, we will discuss both precpective in details' lack academic precision. The position of the writer is stated, but the ideas are not fully extended with robust examples. The response meets the task requirements by covering both questions, earning a Band 6.0 according to the descriptors.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The essay displays a general logical arrangement with clear attempts at paragraphing and basic cohesive devices like 'To begin with', 'In contrast', and 'In conclusion'. However, cohesion is often mechanical and sometimes faulty. For instance, transitional phrases are occasionally misused or awkwardly linked, as seen in 'furthermore, we will discuss both precpective in details in this essay.' Additionally, referencing and pronoun use can be unclear, such as 'he will not able to get good a good job in the surroundings.' Paragraphing is used, but internal flow within paragraphs is hindered by repetitive phrasing and grammatical friction, placing this at a Band 5.5.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, but contains numerous spelling and word choice errors. Examples include 'vications' instead of 'vacations', 'sudents' instead of 'students', 'precpective' instead of 'perspective', and 'knowldge' instead of 'knowledge'. There are also awkward collocations like 'deal costomers' and 'juge a student capabilities'. While the student attempts less common vocabulary such as 'significant proportion of population' and 'considerable benefits', the frequent spelling mistakes and inaccuracies limit the lexical score to a Band 5.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response features a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but attempts at complex structures are frequently faulty. There are persistent grammatical errors, particularly with verb forms and modal auxiliary usage, such as 'they could able to learn', 'if student will disconnected', and 'he will not able'. Punctuation is also weak, with run-on sentences and comma splices, such as 'It has numerous benefits for the students, they could able to learn many new skills...'. These frequent errors occasionally impede communication and align the grammar with Band 5.0 descriptors.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.