Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, primary and secondary schools close for two months or more in the summer holidays.

What is the value of long school holidays?

What are the arguments in favour of shorter school holidays?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In some nations all schools are given vactions for two or more months during the summer season. Children are given holidays to be protected from hot days. additionally to give teachers some relief to have time with their lovedonce. While short holidays can improve children’s grades furthermore hostiltes will be able to visit their familes often.

Some countries such as Pakistan and india, get extremely hot or almost unliviable during summer days that students get fainted is common and some get into serious health conditions. To protect young youth from scorching heat schools are closed by governments. Additionally children teachers get very long time to spend with their lovedonce by going to picnics to visitng new cities.

Some argue short holidays can be benicial for children’s well being, because during whole acedamic journey they don’t get holidays except weekends or occasional. Given them two or three short holidays can give them time to explore more to what they are tought in school while teacher can give them reseach based assignments. Additionally short holidays are favorable for those who live apart from their parents this way they can visit there families couple times which used to visit once a year.

In conclusion, given long holidays specfically in south Asian countries result into saving thousands of life children from extreme heat. Moreover it can give teacher time to spend time with their familes. However shorter breaks can increase their grades by assigning students reseach projects, and it can make condition for students residing apart from families to visit them.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing the value of long holidays, such as protection from extreme heat and spending time with family, as well as the arguments in favour of shorter holidays, like academic improvement and frequent family visits. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. For example, the mention of hot weather leading to students fainting in Pakistan and India is relevant, but the arguments regarding shorter holidays lack deep extension. Furthermore, there are some logical gaps, such as the sudden mention of 'hostiltes' instead of hostels or students. The position is clear, but due to under-developed arguments and minor lapses in task focus, it fits the Band 5 descriptors well.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response is organized into paragraphs, attempting an introduction, body paragraphs addressing the prompts, and a conclusion. However, the overall progression is disjointed due to frequent referencing and cohesion errors. For instance, transitional phrases like 'additionally to give teachers' and 'furthermore hostiltes will be able' are grammatically awkward and impair smooth flow. Pronoun referencing is also weak, making it difficult at times to track whether the writer is referring to students, teachers, or parents. Paragraphing is present, but internal logical transitions are mechanical and inadequate, placing the response firmly at Band 5.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive, with noticeable spelling and word-choice errors that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. Examples of lexical errors include 'vactions' for vacations, 'unliviable' for unlivable, 'lovedonce' for loved ones, 'benicial' for beneficial, 'acedamic' for academic, and 'specfically' specifically. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary such as 'scorching heat' and 'research-based assignments,' but persistent spelling mistakes and inaccurate word forms, such as 'hostiltes' and 'tought,' restrict the lexical score to a Band 4.5, rounded to 5.0 based on positive aspects of minimally adequate range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but frequent grammatical errors and poor punctuation significantly impact accuracy. There are frequent missing prepositions, subject-verb agreement errors, and tense inconsistencies, such as 'that students get fainted is common' and 'Given them two or three short holidays can give them time.' Punctuation is also neglected, with run-on sentences lacking appropriate commas or conjunctions. While meaning can mostly be deciphered, the high frequency of errors across basic and complex sentences prevents the response from reaching Band 6.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.