Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, primary and secondary schools close for two months or more in the summer holidays.

What is the value of long school holidays?

What are the arguments in favour of shorter school holidays?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In many developed and under- developed countries, primary and secondary schools take break for two months in summer.

No doubt, global warming is prevailing over the time and climate condition is becoming worse. The diverse effects of this variation in climate could be seen on all the corners of the world. Long Summer break in schools is also the part of this effect among all. The students in public schools travel from bus or sometimes by foot. Additionally, long morning assemblies and extra curricular activities could have harmed the individuals under 18. Consequently, long Summer break would have been salutary for the health of children. No one can deny the harmful effects of UV rays. No doubt, these can surge the chances of cancer in the students who use to go to school by foot or on the bikes. The pandits of science and technology have been working to over the global warming but long summer break can get rid the individual from harsh effects of heat.

On the other hand, A student study five days of a week normally and the total working days are two hundred and forty in a year. Furthermore, by subtracting two months from this number of the days, a student study only one hundred and eighty days. No doubt, every country celebrates cultural and religious festivals and due to these the number of breaks could have risen dramatically. Unfortunately, there are just about hundred of days to attend the school which could have risen if a student get sick or to stick in any urgent work. Along with all this, long school holidays could have effected the students' mind drastically. Children of this age group learn the new things rapidly whereas the break can damage the acquiring cells and shatter the sense of discipline in a worse manner.

Instead of giving long breaks, authorities should work along with technology and to start online classes. This initiative would have given the promising pros to this area.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both questions: the first body paragraph explains how a long summer break may protect children from heat and UV exposure, while the second presents concerns about lost study time, disrupted learning and discipline. These are relevant points, and the final sentence proposes online classes. However, the response only partially develops the task. The discussion focuses heavily on climate and school attendance, while the value of a long holiday for rest, family time or other activities is not explored. The case for shorter holidays is also difficult to follow because the calculation of school days is unclear and does not directly establish why shorter breaks would help. State your position clearly and explain each main argument with a specific example or consequence.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has an identifiable structure: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs and a concluding suggestion. Phrases such as “On the other hand” signal a change in viewpoint, and “Additionally” and “Furthermore” help connect supporting points. However, progression within paragraphs is uneven. The first paragraph moves from global warming to assemblies, UV rays and scientific work without clearly showing how each point supports the value of a long holiday. In the second, the school-day calculation interrupts the argument about learning and discipline. Some linking expressions are repetitive or do not express the relationship precisely. Organise each paragraph around one clear central claim, then develop it in a logical sequence with explicit links between cause and effect.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “global warming,” “UV rays,” “cultural and religious festivals” and “sense of discipline.” This shows an effort to use language beyond basic terms. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, sometimes making the intended meaning harder to understand. For example, “the pandits of science and technology” is not an appropriate expression for scientists, and “get rid the individual from harsh effects of heat” is awkward. There are also inconsistent forms such as “under- developed” and “Summer.” Aim for precise, natural collocations rather than overly formal or unusual wording, and check spelling and word forms. Clearer vocabulary would make your relevant ideas easier to follow.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including clauses introduced by “whereas” and “which,” but complex structures are often not controlled accurately. Errors occur in subject–verb agreement and verb forms: “A student study” should be “A student studies,” and “a student get sick” should be “a student gets sick.” Tense and modal choices are also problematic, as in “would have been salutary” and “could have harmed,” where the intended general meaning calls for a more suitable present form. Articles and sentence construction need attention too, as in “take break” and “the total working days.” These recurring errors sometimes make relationships between ideas unclear. Practise accurate basic clauses first, then build longer sentences and proofread agreement, tense and articles.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.