Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-07-24
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The charts below give information about a public library in a town called Little Chalfont.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
The presented charts offer various information regarding a public library situated in the town of Little Chalfont.
Overall, library readers were divided into four different age groups, where over half of them was adults. Apart from this, loaned books were also in seven separate category, while the loaned numbers fluctuated throughout the period from 2007 to 2016.
In 2007, number of loaned books started at approximately sixteen thousand, where its started to increase until 2011 and to more ups and falls. Ended with the highest number of around twenty three thousand in 2016. Following, the two most chosen genre in mortgage books 2016 was children's fiction and adult fiction occupying little more then a three quarter combined. Whereas, children's DVD with the smallest amount of 1% besides young adults. Finally, the majority of the reader in 2016 was adults aged from 18-64, ranked before the children with a little over fifth.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response covers the main features of the charts, including the trend of loaned books and the demographic/genre breakdowns. However, the analysis is somewhat superficial. For instance, the description of the trend for loaned books is vague, using phrases like 'more ups and falls' rather than describing the specific fluctuations or the overall upward trajectory clearly. While the main features are identified, the comparison between categories could be more precise. The report meets the minimum length requirement, but the lack of detailed data points and the slightly disjointed presentation of the information prevent it from reaching a higher band.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The response is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is sometimes mechanical or inaccurate. For example, the transition 'Following, the two most chosen genre...' is awkward and does not effectively link the ideas. Additionally, the referencing is occasionally unclear, such as the phrase 'besides young adults' which is tacked onto the end of a sentence without a clear logical connection to the preceding clause. While the overall progression is logical, the lack of sophisticated linking words and some awkward phrasing impacts the flow.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. There are several instances of incorrect word choice or collocation, such as 'mortgage books' (likely intended to be 'loaned books') and 'little more then a three quarter combined' (should be 'than'). The use of 'ups and falls' is informal and imprecise for an academic report. While the student attempts to use specific terminology related to the charts, the errors in word choice and the limited range of vocabulary restrict the score to the 5.5–6.0 range.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include 'over half of them was adults' (subject-verb agreement), 'seven separate category' (pluralisation), and 'the majority of the reader... was adults' (pluralisation). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of commas. While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of these errors indicates a lack of control over complex structures, which is a characteristic of the 5.5–6.0 band range.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
