Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-07-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below give information about a public library in a town called Little Chalfont.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The given mixed charts illustrate the information about the total number of loans from 2007 to 2016 as well as loans by category and the age of the library members in 2016.

Overall, it is clear that the highest number of loans recorded in 2016 whereas, the lowest in 2007. In addition, children's fiction and adult fiction occupied the largest shares.

In 2016, 51% of adults which age from 18-64 accounted for the numerous library members while, children accounted for 22% library members. Young adults aged 13-17 recorded 15% and adults aged 65 and over represented 12% . Children's fiction and adult fiction each categories stood at 38% of total loans. 13% of total loans by adult non-fiction and 6% occupied children's non-fiction. Young adult and adult audiobooks remained same 2 percent loans. Children's DVDs mentioned the smallest share, at 1%.

In 2007, 16,000 number of loans represented. In 2008 and 2009 it remained stable at 19,000. Between 2010 and 2012, the number of loans increased moderately to 21,000. From 2013 onwards, total number of loans fell to 19,500. At the end of the year 2016 it accounted for 21,000.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

You have successfully identified the main features of the charts and provided relevant comparisons. You covered the trends in total loans, the breakdown of categories, and the age demographics of members. However, the report is slightly unbalanced; the chronological order of the paragraphs is a bit confusing, as you discuss 2016 data before the 2007-2016 trend. Additionally, some data points, such as the 2016 loan figure, are slightly misaligned with the provided chart. To reach a higher band, ensure that the overview clearly synthesizes the data rather than just listing features, and double-check that all figures cited accurately reflect the visual information provided.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is organized into logical paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the information. You use some cohesive devices like 'In addition' and 'From 2013 onwards' to link ideas. However, the progression between paragraphs could be smoother. The transition from the 2016 demographic data to the 2007-2016 trend feels abrupt. Furthermore, some referencing is slightly mechanical or repetitive. Improving the use of cohesive devices to show the relationship between the different charts would enhance the flow of your writing and help you achieve a higher score.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You have a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information clearly, such as 'accounted for', 'represented', and 'remained stable'. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'each categories stood at' (should be 'each category accounted for') and 'remained same 2 percent' (should be 'remained the same at 2 percent'). While these errors do not impede communication, they limit the precision of your report. To improve, focus on using more varied and precise terminology for describing trends and proportions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

You demonstrate a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as '51% of adults which age from 18-64' (should be 'aged 18-64') and '16,000 number of loans represented' (should be '16,000 loans were recorded'). Additionally, there are issues with article usage and prepositions. While these errors are noticeable, they rarely impede the reader's understanding of the data. To move to a higher band, focus on ensuring subject-verb agreement and refining your use of relative clauses and passive voice constructions.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.