Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below give information about a public library in a town called Little Chalfont.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.





 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The bar chat shows the loan over the period of time from [redacted phone]. The pie chat shows each age group of the library members in 2016. And the table shows the loan by category in 2016.

Overall, adults aged 18-64 made up the majority of library members in 2016, while fiction books were by far the most popular among both children and adults. Additionally, the total number of items borrowed shows an increasing trend over the ten year period.

In 2016, adults aged 18-64 represented over half of all library members being 51%, followed by children being 22%, young adults aged 13-17 being 15%, and adults aged 65 and over being 12%. In terms of item categories, children's fiction and adult fiction were the most borrowed, each accounting for 38%. Non fiction items were less borrowed both for children and adults. Adults noon fitting making up 13% while children making up only 6%. Audio books were the least borrowed between 1%-2%.

The overall number of loans expanded overall from around 15000 items in 2007 to 15500 items in 2016. Reaching the highest number in

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response covers all three visual aids and highlights key features and comparisons. You successfully identified the majority age group and the most popular book categories. However, the report is incomplete as the final sentence is cut off mid-thought, which prevents a full summary of the trend data. To improve, ensure you complete all sentences and provide a more thorough analysis of the data points, such as mentioning the specific fluctuations or the overall growth rate more clearly. Despite the incomplete ending, the main features are adequately selected and reported.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized into an introduction, an overview, and body paragraphs. The use of cohesive devices like 'Overall', 'Additionally', and 'In terms of' helps guide the reader through the data. However, the abrupt ending significantly impacts the flow and coherence of the final paragraph. Paragraphing is used appropriately, but the transition between the data points could be smoother. To reach a higher band, ensure that your ideas are fully developed and that the text concludes in a complete, cohesive manner rather than trailing off.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You have a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information, such as 'represented', 'accounting for', and 'increasing trend'. However, there are several spelling and word-choice errors, such as 'bar chat' (chart), 'noon fitting' (non-fiction), and 'between 1%-2%' (which is slightly awkward phrasing). These errors do not impede communication, but they do limit the precision of your report. To improve, focus on using more accurate terminology for data description and proofread carefully to avoid simple spelling mistakes.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While many sentences are clear, there are grammatical inaccuracies, such as 'The bar chat shows the loan' (should be 'loans') and 'Adults noon fitting making up 13%' (which lacks a main verb). The final sentence is a fragment, which is a significant grammatical error. While you demonstrate an attempt at complex structures, the frequency of errors in basic grammar and the incomplete sentence structure prevent a higher score. Focus on subject-verb agreement and ensuring every sentence has a clear subject and predicate.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.