Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below give information about a public library in a town called Little Chalfont.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.





 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

These diagrams illustrate the ages of library members and loans taken by various categories in 2016 and total loans obtained from 2007 to 2016 in Little Chalfont library.

Overall, the largest group of library users contains adults from the age of 18 to 64 with a proportion of 51%. In contrast, young adults from 13 to 17 years contribute only 15% as the smallest one in 2016. Additionally, regarding book loans, most of the loans, accounting for about 38%, were taken by children's fiction and adult fiction each while just 1% of loans acquired by children's DVDs. Additionally, the maximum number of loans around 22,000 was obtained in 2016. However, in 2007, only 16,000 loans were issued.

Furthermore, children with 22% utilized the library whereas the adults over 65 did so with 12%. Subsequently, adult audio books and young adults had the ratio of loans obtained with 2%. Whereas, adult non-fiction took 13% and children's non

In 2008 and 2009, 18,000 loans were with same number while 2010 and 2012 contain same amount.In 2013, it reduced a bit

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response covers the main features of the charts, including age demographics, loan categories, and the ten-year trend. However, the report is incomplete; the final sentence is cut off mid-thought ('children's non'), and the description of the trend data is fragmented and lacks a clear, analytical summary. While the key features are identified, the lack of a cohesive conclusion and the abrupt ending prevent a higher score. The data is presented, but the comparison between categories could be more integrated to better highlight the 'main features' as requested by the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is divided into paragraphs, but the logical flow is disrupted by the incomplete final sentence and the disjointed nature of the trend analysis. While some cohesive devices like 'Additionally,' 'Furthermore,' and 'In contrast' are used, the transition between the static data (2016) and the trend data (2007-2016) is abrupt. The paragraphing is inconsistent, with the final paragraph being very short and failing to provide a logical conclusion to the report. The referencing is generally clear, but the overall structure lacks the polish required for a higher band.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, using terms like 'proportion,' 'contribute,' and 'utilized.' However, there are some awkward collocations and word choices, such as 'total loans obtained' instead of 'total number of loans' and 'acquired by children's DVDs' which is slightly unnatural. The range is somewhat limited, and the repetition of 'loans' and 'obtained' suggests a lack of variety. The vocabulary is sufficient to convey the basic meaning, but it lacks the precision and flexibility expected at higher levels.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'the smallest one in 2016' (referring to a group) and '18,000 loans were with same number.' Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with missing spaces after periods (e.g., '2012 contain same amount.In 2013'). While the errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to be noticeable. The sentence structure is often repetitive, relying heavily on simple subject-verb-object patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.