Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-26

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below give information about a public library in a town called Little Chalfont.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.





 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The charts display the information related to library members and the number of loans taken by it and the proportion of it.

Overall, the highest proportion was accounted by adults, whereas elderly made up the smallest ratio. Fiction books accoutend for the highest amount of loan.

The 18-64 aged people accounted for the largest proportions, with 51%, while the children made up 22%. Both 13-17 young adults and elderly people constituted for 15% and 12%, respectively. Children's and adult's fiction accounted for the largest proportion of loan, at 38%, while the children's DVD made up just 1% of loan. Young adults and adult audio books accounted for 2%, followed by non-fiction who made up 6%.

In 2007, over 15000 loans were taken by library, incresing the number to 21000 in 2011, before slightly falling to 19000 by 2009. In 2013, there was minor decline to nearly 20000, which was reaching at a peak point in 2016, at 22000.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The student successfully addresses all parts of the visual data by reporting the main features, proportions, and trends across the three charts provided. An overview is present, highlighting the main extremes, such as adults accounting for the highest proportion and elderly for the smallest. Key data points are accurately cited, including the 51% for adults aged 18-64 and the 38% for fiction books. However, there are minor confusions in the chronological trend description in the final paragraph, where the sequence of years and figures contains some inaccuracies regarding the timeline of loans. Despite these minor data reading lapses, the response covers all parts of the task adequately and provides relevant comparisons.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response is arranged logically into four paragraphs, moving from an introduction and overview to specific breakdown details and finally the overall trend over time. Cohesive devices are used appropriately, such as 'whereas', 'while', and 'respectively'. However, referencing and progression become slightly strained in the final paragraph, where the temporal sequencing of the loan data (e.g., jumping between 2007, 2011, 2009, and 2013) feels a bit disjointed and harder to follow. Paragraphing is used sufficiently to separate distinct visual elements of the task.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for task 1, successfully employing terms such as 'proportion', 'constituted', 'category', and 'peak point'. There are several spelling and word choice errors, such as 'accoutend' instead of 'accounted', 'incresing' instead of 'increasing', and awkward phrasing like 'loans taken by library'. Less common lexical items are attempted, but inaccuracies in collocation and spelling prevent the response from achieving a higher band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including relative clauses and comparative forms (e.g., 'The 18-64 aged people accounted for the largest proportions, with 51%, while the children made up 22%'). There are several grammatical errors and awkward structures throughout, such as 'accounted by adults', 'elderly made up', and 'was reaching at a peak point'. Punctuation is generally acceptable, and while these errors are noticeable, they do not impede overall communication.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.