Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below give information about a public library in a town called Little Chalfont.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The three different charts, pie chart, bar chart and the table provides an information about a public library situated in a town called known as Little Chalfont.

Overall, the pie chart is devided into 4 age groups of the library members. In the mean time we can also see total number of loans by category in 2016 between the 7 categories. On the other hand, we can also observe the total number of loans over the period of ten years from 2007 till 2016.

In 2016, the majority of the library members were the adults which occupied 51% of the total strength of library members followed by children approximatly half of the adults with 22%. The young adults and adults over 65 were significantly lower in number with only 12% and 15%.

Observing the data table we can see the highest loan by the categories are on Children's fiction with 38% as well as 38% for Adult fiction. In contrast, Children's DVDs with the least loan of 1% only. Through bar chart we can learn that the highest number of loans were in the year 2016 approximately 22,000. Whereas, the lowest number of loan can be observed in 2007 nearing to 16,000.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover all three visuals and identify several important features: adults form the largest membership group, fiction accounts for the largest loan shares, and total loans are highest in 2016 and lowest in 2007. The figures for the loan categories and the overall endpoints are broadly accurate. However, there is a significant mix-up in the age data: children are 22%, young adults 15%, and members aged 65 and over 12%, but you assign 12% to young adults and 15% to older adults. The overview mainly describes what each visual shows rather than summarising the key patterns, and the line chart’s fluctuations between 2007 and 2016 are not reported. More precise comparisons and a clearer overview would make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, and paragraphs covering membership, loan categories, and the trend in total loans. This makes the information easy to locate, and phrases such as “In contrast” and “Whereas” help signal comparisons. However, the overview mostly lists the contents of the visuals instead of bringing their main findings together, so progression between the overview and details is limited. Some linking phrases feel mechanical or do not establish a strong relationship between ideas, particularly “In the mean time” and “On the other hand.” The final paragraph also combines the table and chart without much development of the chart’s intermediate changes. Grouping related comparisons more deliberately and using clearer referencing would strengthen cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for describing charts, including “majority,” “followed by,” “significantly lower,” and “approximately.” These choices generally communicate the intended comparisons, and the reader can understand the main points. However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “total strength of library members,” “highest loan by the categories,” and “the least loan.” There are also spelling errors, including “devided” and “approximatly,” and some repetition of “we can see” and “observe.” Aim for more precise chart language and check spelling: for example, describe the “proportion of members” and the “share of loans,” rather than using “strength” or “loan” as a countable item.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “the highest number of loans were in the year 2016” and comparison structures such as “followed by children.” Meaning is generally clear, but some grammatical errors remain. The opening has subject–verb disagreement (“The three different charts … provides”), and “an information” uses an uncountable noun with an article. There are also awkward sentence constructions, such as “the majority … were the adults which occupied 51%,” and the age comparison sentence is difficult to follow. Check agreement, articles, and clause structure, and use a consistent past tense when reporting the 2016 data. More consistently accurate complex sentences would improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.