Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-10
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The charts illustrate the average percentage of meals with three different type of nutrients which may be proved as unhealthy if eaten too much.
Overall, it is evident that dinner meal was prominent among different type of nutrients with reliable percentage as compare to other meals. While on the other hand, breakfast acquired lowest average percentage among the other types of meal.
To begin with sodium category, snack and breakfast meals contain same weightage 14%. Although, the dinner was most dominating meal in this category with 43%. While , on the other side lunch category secure 29% with moderate proportion.
In the saturated fat nutrients, dinner meal hold 37% with highest figure between the nutrients, 26% in the lunch meal. Moreover, the snack meal obtain 21%. While, breakfast was one meal in this category that get minimum percentage with 16%.
Nevertheless, in the added sugar nutrients, snack meal with 42% leads in this category and dinner with 23% on the moderate level in this nutrients. Furthemore, breakfast and lunch have lowest percentage such as breakfast with 16% and lunch 19%.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You report the main meal patterns and include several accurate figures: dinner is highest for sodium (43%) and saturated fat (37%), while snacks lead for added sugar (42%). The overview also identifies dinner as prominent overall and breakfast as low, which gives the reader a useful summary. However, the overview is too broad: breakfast is not the lowest meal for every nutrient, since snacks are also 14% for sodium and breakfast is not the lowest for added sugar. The added-sugar comparison is partly unclear when you describe breakfast and lunch as having the “lowest percentage”; lunch is 19%, but breakfast is 16%, and dinner is 23%. Make the overview more precise by highlighting the contrast between dinner’s sodium/fat peaks and snacks’ sugar peak, and ensure comparisons are clearly ranked.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction and overview are followed by separate discussion of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar. This makes the chart categories easy to locate, and the figures generally appear in a sensible order. Cohesion is less effective where linking phrases are repeated or used awkwardly, such as “While on the other hand,” “Although,” and “While, on the other side.” These transitions sometimes interrupt rather than clarify the comparison. The final paragraph also combines several added-sugar figures without a clear ranking. Use fewer, more precise connectors and build each paragraph around a clear comparison—for example, contrast the snack share with dinner, then mention breakfast and lunch.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use a reasonable range of vocabulary for describing proportions, including “prominent,” “moderate proportion,” “highest figure,” and “leads.” These attempts show some flexibility beyond basic terms, and the meaning is usually understandable. However, several choices are unnatural or imprecise for chart reporting: “reliable percentage,” “same weightage,” “most dominating,” and “secure 29%.” There are also word-form and spelling slips, including “different type” and “Furthemore.” Prefer standard collocations such as “accounted for,” “represented,” and “recorded,” and use “share” or “proportion” rather than “weightage.” More accurate, natural phrasing would make the comparisons clearer without requiring more elaborate vocabulary.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple statements and more complex comparisons, and the reader can generally follow the data. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with articles, agreement and sentence construction. For example, “dinner meal was prominent” needs a more natural article or plural construction, while “dinner meal hold 37%” has incorrect subject–verb agreement and tense. The sentence beginning “Although, the dinner was most dominating…” is not correctly connected to the following clause, and “While, breakfast was one meal…” is also an incomplete or awkwardly attached structure. Punctuation around introductory linkers is inconsistent. Aim for complete, direct sentences with consistent present tense, such as “Dinner accounts for 37% of saturated fat intake, the highest share among the meals.”
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.