Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA

IELTS Writing

Student answer (Band 7.0)

The given three pie charts depict the proportions of three types of nutrients (sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar) consumed in regular meals in the USA. These nutrients can be unhealthy if eaten in large amounts.

Overall, it is crystal clear that sodium and saturated fat are consumed in greater proportions at dinner, while added sugar is more frequently ingested in snacks.

At a fleeting glance, at breakfast, American residents consume 14% of their daily sodium intake, an equal percentage of saturated fat, and 16% of their added sugar intake. In snacks, they consume the same amount of sodium (14%), 21% of saturated fat, and a significantly higher quantity of added sugar, at 42%.

Moreover, during lunch, Americans consume nearly one-third 29% of their daily sodium intake, 26% of saturated fat, and just under one-fifth 19% of added sugar. Conversely, dinner accounts for the largest portions, with more than two-fifths 43% of daily sodium intake, just under two-fifths 37% of saturated fat, and slightly less than one-quarter 23% of added sugar.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.0
Coherence and Cohesion7.0
Lexical Resource6.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.5
Overall7.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response effectively addresses the task by identifying the main features and making relevant comparisons across the three nutrients. You have successfully highlighted the key trends, such as the high proportion of added sugar in snacks and the dominance of sodium and saturated fat at dinner. The data is accurately reported, and the overview provides a clear summary of the information. To reach a higher band, ensure that all comparisons are fully integrated into the narrative rather than just listing figures. For example, you could explicitly contrast the snack intake of sugar with the other meals more deeply to demonstrate a more sophisticated analytical approach.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The response is logically organized with a clear introduction, overview, and body paragraphs. The progression of ideas is smooth, and you have used cohesive devices such as 'Moreover' and 'Conversely' effectively to link your points. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the different meal categories. The structure is clear and easy to follow. To improve further, ensure that the transition between the overview and the body paragraphs is slightly more seamless, and avoid minor mechanical issues like the awkward placement of percentages in parentheses, which can disrupt the flow of the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You have used a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information accurately. Phrases like 'proportions of three types of nutrients' and 'significantly higher quantity' demonstrate a good command of language. However, the vocabulary is somewhat functional and lacks the 'less common' items that would push the score into the 8.0+ range. To improve, try to incorporate more varied reporting verbs or descriptive adjectives to characterize the data trends, such as 'predominant,' 'marginal,' or 'a substantial portion.' The current range is adequate but could be more precise and varied.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The response displays a good mix of simple and complex sentence structures. Most sentences are error-free, and your control of punctuation is generally sound. There are a few minor issues with phrasing, such as 'nearly one-third 29%,' where the inclusion of the percentage alongside the fraction is slightly redundant and clunky. To achieve a higher band, focus on integrating these figures more naturally into the sentence structure without relying on repetitive patterns. Overall, your grammar is accurate enough that it does not impede communication, and you demonstrate a solid grasp of complex sentence forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.