Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie charts illustrate the average percentages of three unhealthy nutrients used in typical meals consumed in the USA. These nuhealthy nutrients include sodium, saturated fats and added sugars.

The consumption of sodium is more significant in dinner which is almost 43%, followed by lunch that constitute about 29% of sodium. Whereas, breakfast and snack show equal share of sodium consumption which is about 14%.

On the other hand, the amount of the saturated fats consmption is about 37% in dinner, followed by lunch that show its consumption of about 26%. However, breakfast show the least proportion of saturated fats that is about 16%. Snack also constitute 21% of saturated fats cosumptio.

Added sugar show considerable amount of consumption in snack that is about 42%. Breakfast consume almost 16% of added sugars. While, lunch and dinner also represent considerable amount of sugar consumption which is about 19% and 23%.

Overall, sodium and saturated fats consumption show considerable amount in dinner as compare to added sugar which show high consumption in snacks. While, All the three nutrients show less percentages of consumption in breakfast.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover all three nutrients and report the main meal patterns accurately: sodium and saturated fat peak at dinner, while added sugar is highest in snacks. The figures given—such as 43% sodium at dinner, 37% saturated fat at dinner and 42% added sugar in snacks—match the chart, and the final overview identifies the key contrast. This meets the task well, with some features more fully reported than others: for example, the added-sugar paragraph lists the meal figures but does not clearly compare the snack share with the other meals. To strengthen the response further, make the overview more precise and compare the distributions directly, including that breakfast is the lowest for saturated fat and sodium is tied between breakfast and snacks.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for each nutrient, and a concluding overview. This makes the information easy to locate, and phrases such as “On the other hand” and “Overall” help signal shifts. However, some linking is mechanical or awkward, and sentence fragments weaken the flow—for example, “Whereas, breakfast and snack…” and “While, lunch and dinner…”. The final overview also repeats earlier points rather than drawing the comparisons together smoothly. For stronger progression, connect related meal patterns across nutrients and use complete sentences with fewer formulaic transitions. Clearer referencing, such as specifying “the proportion of added sugar,” would also make links between ideas more precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “proportion,” “consumption,” “followed by,” and “considerable,” so the meaning is generally understandable. However, the range is limited by repeated use of “consumption” and “considerable amount,” and several collocations are unnatural, such as “more significant in dinner” and “show its consumption.” There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “nuhealthy,” “consumptio,” and “cosumptio,” which reduce accuracy and polish. Aim for more precise language for describing shares and rankings, and check spelling carefully. A wider set of natural expressions would help you report comparisons without repeating the same wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, and the reader can usually follow the comparisons. However, errors in agreement and sentence construction recur: “breakfast show” should be “breakfast shows,” “lunch that constitute” needs “constitutes,” and “Added sugar show” needs “Added sugar shows.” Some clauses are incomplete or incorrectly punctuated, notably “Whereas, breakfast and snack…” and “While, lunch and dinner…”. The final sentence also has inconsistent capitalisation after “While.” These issues do not generally prevent understanding, but they limit control and make several sentences less fluent. Practise forming complete clauses and checking subject–verb agreement, especially when the subject is a meal or nutrient.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.