Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie charts illustrate the average proportions in typical meals of three types of nutrients, namely sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar, all which may be unhealthy if excessively consumed. Overall, in dinner, sodium and saturated fat had the largest proportions as compared to other nutrients. Meanwhile, the added sugar was responsible for around half of the nutrients in snack.

Regarding sodium, dinner representd 43% of sodium, followed by lunch at 29%. Breakfast and snack acounted for same quantity of sodium, at 14%. In comparison, saturated fat had comparatively fewer quantity in dinner, at 37%. Lunch represented 26% and snack was responsible for 21% of saturated fat. Moreover, breakfast had a smallest contribution in saturated fat, at 16%.

On the contrary, added sugar was found to be a dominating nutirent in snack, at 42%. 23% of added sugar was found in dinner, whereas luck represented 19%. Finally, breakfast comprised 16% of added sugar.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You cover all three nutrients and report most figures accurately, including dinner as the largest source of sodium (43%) and saturated fat (37%), and snacks as the largest source of added sugar (42%). The overview identifies these main contrasts, but “around half” is a little imprecise for 42%, and the comparison between nutrients could be developed more clearly. There is also a factual slip: “luck represented 19%” should be lunch. The response is five words below the 150-word minimum, which limits how fully the key features are summarised. Add a concise comparison, such as how added sugar differs from the dinner-led pattern for the other nutrients, and check labels and figures carefully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction and overview are followed by paragraphs on sodium and saturated fat, then added sugar. This makes the information easy to follow, and linking phrases such as “Regarding sodium,” “In comparison,” and “On the contrary” help signal shifts. The progression is generally logical, though some connections are mechanical or not quite suited to the relationship being described; “On the contrary” introduces a new nutrient rather than a direct contradiction. The overview also groups two nutrients together, while the body treats them separately. To strengthen cohesion, use more precise transitions and make the overview’s comparisons align closely with the order and grouping of the detail paragraphs.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of chart vocabulary, including “proportions,” “represented,” “comprised,” and “contribution,” and the meaning is generally clear. However, several word-choice and collocation problems reduce precision: “responsible for” is awkward for a chart share, “fewer quantity” is not idiomatic, and “dominating nutrient” overstates the idea. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “representd,” “acounted,” “nutirent,” and “luck,” which can distract the reader. Aim for accurate, natural reporting language and proofread carefully. Reusing a small set of reliable verbs such as “accounted for,” “made up,” and “stood at” would be more effective than forcing less suitable expressions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and more complex structures, including the opening clause “all which may be unhealthy if excessively consumed” and comparisons introduced by “whereas.” Most figures remain understandable, but some grammatical errors are noticeable. For example, “dinner representd 43%” needs the past-tense form “represented,” while “breakfast and snack accounted for same quantity” needs an article and clearer number agreement (“the same proportion”). “Saturated fat had comparatively fewer quantity” also has a faulty comparative structure. The sentence patterns are mostly straightforward, so vary them carefully while checking verb forms, articles, and singular/plural agreement. These corrections would make the comparisons more controlled and fluent.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.