Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The collection of three pie charts collectively illustrates the proportion of three nutrients named Sodium, Saturated fat and added sugar which are added in typical meals and can be harmful if it taken too much.

Considering it from an overall perspective, it can be comprehensively observed that the highest percentage of all nutrients are taken in dinner except the added sugar which highest taken in snacks.

Taking sodium into consideration. Similar proportion of sodium is observed in the meal of snacks and breakfast which is 14%. Moreover, this nutrient is noticeable at highest percentage in dinner at 43% and 29% in lunch. In contrast, saturated fat is taken at a higher percentage in dinner at 37%. Whereas, 26% in lunch and 21% in snacks and only 14% in breakfast respectively.

Furthermore, the least proportion of added sugar is consumed in breakfast at 14%, whilst the highest proportion in snacks with 42%. Additionally, 23% of added sugar consumed in dinner and 19% in lunch.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response identifies the main pattern accurately: dinner has the largest shares of sodium and saturated fat, while snacks account for the most added sugar. It also reports most figures correctly, including sodium at 14% for breakfast and snacks and 43% for dinner, and added sugar at 42% for snacks. However, there is one important data error: saturated fat at breakfast is 16%, not 14%. The overview is relevant, but “the highest percentage of all nutrients are taken in dinner” is too broad unless the exception is made explicit, as you do afterward. To strengthen the report, check every figure and make the overview more precise by contrasting the dinner-led nutrients with the snack-led sugar pattern.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, and paragraphs reporting the nutrient figures. The progression from sodium to saturated fat and then added sugar is easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “In contrast,” and “Furthermore” help signal relationships. This gives the report a coherent arrangement. However, some connections feel mechanical or incomplete: “Whereas, 26% in lunch…” is a fragment rather than a fully connected comparison, and “Taking sodium into consideration” is an awkward transition. The overview also repeats the dinner pattern before introducing its exception. For a stronger progression, group the two nutrients that peak at dinner, then contrast them with added sugar, using complete sentences and fewer formulaic transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “highest percentage,” “least proportion,” and “consumed,” so the chart’s main comparisons are understandable. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “Considering it from an overall perspective.” However, some choices are unnatural or imprecise: “taken in dinner” and “which are added in typical meals” do not describe the data accurately, while “comprehensively observed” is unnecessarily elaborate. Repetition of “percentage” and “proportion” also limits flexibility. Aim for concise, natural reporting language and accurate collocations, such as “accounted for,” “made up,” and “was highest in.” These refinements would make the vocabulary more precise without requiring more complex wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response attempts a mixture of simple and more complex forms, including a relative clause in the introduction and contrast clauses with “whilst” and “which.” Meaning is generally recoverable, but some grammatical errors remain across the sentences. For example, “if it taken too much” is missing the auxiliary “is,” and “the highest percentage of all nutrients are” has a subject–verb agreement problem. The clause “which highest taken in snacks” also lacks a verb, while “Whereas, 26% in lunch…” is an incomplete sentence. Articles and sentence boundaries need attention as well. Practise building complete comparison sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check agreement and auxiliary verbs during proofreading; this will improve accuracy while preserving your attempts at complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.