Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The three pie charts below illustrates the averaged percentages for three types of nutrients which contains in general foods which can be unhealthy if consumed more than it should be.At a glance,snacks contains higher level of added sugar compared to other nutrients.

Overall,it is evident by the charts that,in terms of containing sodium and saturated fat,the percentage is approximately similar.For instance, morning meals contain 14% of sodium and 16% of saturated fat.Furthermore,the meal people take during lunch consist of 29% of sodium and 26% of saturated fat.However,in terms of snacks and dinner meals the number is slightly different such as snack contains 14% of sodium nutrient whereas,it contains 21% saturated fat and dinner meal consist of 43% sodium and 37% saturated fat respectively.Nevertheless,the chart of containing added sugar has a totally different scenario in two meal perspective such as in snack and dinner where the amount of added sugar are 42% and 23% which is higher and lower comparing to other two nutrients respectively.

In conclusion,if added sugar nutrient is consumed more than the other two nutrients then it may lead to uncertain causes of illness and diseases.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify relevant overall features, especially that snacks have the highest share of added sugar and that sodium and saturated fat follow broadly similar patterns across meals. Several figures are reported accurately, including breakfast, lunch and dinner values for sodium and saturated fat, as well as the snack and dinner added-sugar figures. However, the overview is brief and does not clearly summarise the main contrasts across all three nutrients: for example, dinner is highest in sodium and saturated fat, while snacks are highest in added sugar. The final sentence about possible illness is not required by the chart and takes space from describing the data. A clearer overview and more systematic comparison of the four meals would make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has an overall sequence, moving from an opening observation to comparisons and then a conclusion, and it uses linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “However,” and “Nevertheless.” This gives the reader a general sense of progression. However, the main body is presented as one long paragraph, so the overview and detailed comparisons are not clearly separated. Some transitions are mechanical or do not clarify the relationship between ideas; for instance, “Nevertheless” introduces another comparison rather than a contrast with the preceding point. The repeated “in terms of” and “such as” constructions also make the flow cumbersome, and references such as “the number” are not always precise. Use distinct paragraphs and organise comparisons by meal or nutrient.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “percentages,” “nutrients,” “consumed,” and “compared,” and the intended meaning is generally understandable. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “At a glance” and “it is evident.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward: “averaged percentages,” “foods which can be unhealthy,” “the meal people take,” and “uncertain causes of illness” do not sound natural in this context. Repetition of “contains” and “nutrient” limits flexibility, while “higher level” would be clearer as “higher proportion.” Aim for precise chart language such as “accounts for,” “share,” and “contribution,” and avoid adding expressions that do not describe the data.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mixture of simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “whereas” and “which,” and most of the comparisons can be understood. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with subject–verb agreement and sentence construction. For example, “The three pie charts below illustrates” should use a plural verb, and “snacks contains” should be “snacks contain.” In “the amount of added sugar are 42% and 23%,” the subject and verb do not agree, and the sentence structure makes the comparison difficult to follow. Punctuation and spacing are also inconsistent, especially around commas and sentence boundaries. Practise checking agreement and building shorter, complete comparison sentences; this will improve accuracy while retaining your attempts at complex forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.