Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-31

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The provided pie chart illustrates the average percentages in typical meals of three type of nutrients such as sodium, saturated fat, and added sugars consumed in the USA.

Overall, it can be seen that most people are eating sodium and saturated fat in the dinner, while people are consumed hugh sugar in snack. The most natable thing that, the percentage of breakfast are similar in saturated fat and added sugar.

The most dominant sector is dinner in sodium and saturated fat, which at 43% and 37% respectively, whereas individuals are consumed high sugar in snack at around 42%. Followed by, lunch represnted at 29% in sodium, compared with this rate in saturated fat slighly decreased at 26%, however, this proportion fall down andd accounted for 19%.

The most considerably thing that pupils consumed sodium relatively the same percentage in snack and breakfast at 14%. Althpough this figure has shown in saturated fat, which made snack around 21%. The minority secytor is breakfast has in both saturated fat and added sugar represanted at 16%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main overall pattern: dinner has the highest shares of sodium and saturated fat, while snacks account for the largest share of added sugar. The figures of 43%, 37% and 42% are accurate, and you also compare lunch across the nutrients. However, some details are unclear or incomplete: the statement that breakfast percentages are similar for saturated fat and added sugar is supported by both being 16%, but the response does not clearly report the remaining added-sugar figures for breakfast and lunch or the saturated-fat breakfast figure in a well-organised comparison. The overview is relevant, though its wording makes the meal comparisons difficult to follow. More precise coverage of the chart’s key contrasts would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction and overview to details about dinner, lunch, snacks and breakfast. This gives the reader a basic route through the information. However, progression within the detail paragraphs is uneven, and several linking expressions are used mechanically or inaccurately. For example, “Followed by” does not connect smoothly to the preceding sentence, while “compared with this rate” and “however” make the lunch comparisons hard to interpret. The final paragraph also shifts between sodium, saturated fat and breakfast without a clear sequence. Grouping information by meal or by nutrient, then using straightforward comparisons, would make the organisation more coherent and the references easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “percentage,” “sector,” “dominant” and “represented,” and the reader can generally identify the nutrients and meals being compared. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes obscuring meaning. Examples include “people are consumed hugh sugar,” “most natable thing,” and “the most considerably thing”; these are not natural ways to describe chart data. There are also noticeable spelling errors such as “represnted,” “Althpough” and “secytor.” Use precise reporting language such as “accounted for,” “was highest,” and “share,” and check spelling and word forms carefully to improve clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including comparisons with “whereas” and “compared with,” and the main message is usually recoverable. However, errors in sentence construction and verb forms are frequent enough to make some comparisons difficult to understand. For instance, “people are consumed” has an incorrect verb pattern, and “the percentage of breakfast are similar” has a subject–verb agreement problem. The sentence beginning “Followed by, lunch…” is also not a complete, well-formed connection to the previous idea. Articles and sentence boundaries need attention as well. Practise building clear subject–verb sentences first, then add comparison clauses while checking agreement and verb patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.