Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-31

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart illustrates the average amount of three crucial nutrients in our daily meals, which may harmful if consumes in high quantity.

Overall, these nutrients have high consuming percentage in dinner, then in lunch and breakfast respectively. Apart from this the amount of sugar is much high in snack while the saturated fat and sodium is in small quantity.

In USA, people usually consumes the 43% of sodium, 37% of saturated fat and 23% of sugar in dinner while the amount of these nutrients are decrease in lunch that is 29%(sodium), 26%(saturated fat), and 19%(sugar). So, the quantity of nutrients changes from one meal time to another.

Futhermore, these nutrients are also present in snack that usually consumes by some people but not eaten by everyone. The snack contains the 14% of sodium, 21% of saturated fat, and 42% of sugar, which is much more high comparative to other types of nutrients.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main pattern that sodium and saturated fat peak at dinner, while added sugar is highest in snacks, and you support this with several accurate figures. The response also compares dinner and lunch, so the key features are recognisable. However, the overview says all nutrients are highest at dinner, which conflicts with the snack figure for sugar, and the claim that saturated fat and sodium are in small quantities in snacks is not a clear comparison. Breakfast is omitted, and the explanation that snacks are not eaten by everyone is not shown by the chart. To strengthen the summary, make the overview fully accurate and compare all four meals selectively, especially the contrasting peaks.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear four-paragraph structure, moving from an introduction to an overview and then to meal-specific details. Linking expressions such as “Overall,” “while,” and “Furthermore” help signal the stages of the report, and the dinner-to-lunch comparison is easy to follow. Some connections are nevertheless mechanical or unclear: “So, the quantity of nutrients changes from one meal time to another” repeats the preceding comparison rather than advancing it, while “Apart from this” does not clearly introduce the contrast about sugar. The final paragraph also combines chart data with an unsupported comment about who eats snacks. Use more precise referencing and organise the details around the contrasting meal patterns.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “nutrients,” “sodium,” “saturated fat,” and “percentage,” and the reader can generally understand the comparisons. However, several word choices and collocations are noticeably inaccurate, such as “average amount” for percentages, “high consuming percentage,” and “much more high comparative to.” “Crucial” is also not needed to describe the chart and adds an evaluative meaning. Spelling errors such as “Futhermore” further reduce control. Aim for precise reporting language and natural collocations—for example, say that a nutrient “accounts for” a percentage or is “highest in” a meal. This would make the vocabulary more accurate and flexible without changing the meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a contrast with “while” and a relative clause beginning “which.” The main comparisons remain understandable, but errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction are evident. For example, “which may harmful if consumes” is missing grammatical elements, and “people usually consumes” has a subject–verb agreement error. In “the amount of these nutrients are decrease,” the subject and verb form do not agree, while “the quantity of nutrients changes” is followed by an awkwardly constructed explanation. Work on complete clause structure, matching verbs to their subjects, and using articles consistently. More accurate control of these patterns would make your complex sentences clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.