Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-04
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The given pie chart compares average percentages of nutrients sodium,saturated fat and added sugar in regular meals.all of them may be unhealthy if it consumed much more.
Overall, sodium used significantally for dinner.also saturated fat mostly preferd by people for dinner.In contrast, majorlly added sugar consumed by people for snack.lunch favored middle usage of three different nutrient.whereas,breakfast represent least ratio of these factors.
To begin with,sodium and saturated fat are vital for dinner.it displays 43% of sodium and 37% of saturated fat for dinner.however,breakfast and snack both shows 14% usage of sodium,while these two has 21% and 16% proportion of saturated fat which was higher than sodium.Moreover, 29% sodium and 26% saturated fat intaked by people in their lunch time.
conversaly,42% added sugar utilized for snack.however, dinner uptake 23% of added sugar,while 19% sugar add for lunch as well as 16% amount of sugar enlarged in breakfast.which was least usage of sugar in tis parcticular factor instead of others.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You identify the main contrasts accurately: dinner has the highest shares of sodium and saturated fat (43% and 37%), while snacks account for the most added sugar (42%). You also include the key figures for the other meals, so the response addresses the chart and gives a relevant overview. This shows some of the stronger features expected beyond a basic summary. However, the overview is not always precise: saying breakfast has the least ratio of “these factors” is misleading because snacks, not breakfast, have the lowest sodium share, and breakfast is not the lowest for saturated fat. Clarify that the lowest meal varies by nutrient, and make comparisons more explicit to develop the summary further.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for sodium/saturated fat and added sugar. This helps the reader follow the broad organisation. Some progression is also created with markers such as “To begin with” and “Moreover.” However, connections are sometimes mechanical or unclear. Repeated “however” does not always signal a genuine contrast, and the overview’s “lunch favored middle usage” is difficult to interpret. The final sentence also combines several comparisons without a clear link between them. Use more precise transitions and organise each paragraph around a clear comparison—for example, contrast dinner’s high sodium and fat shares with the snack peak for sugar. Check punctuation and spacing so sentence boundaries are easy to follow.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some task-relevant terms, including “average percentages,” “proportion,” and “uptake,” and you attempt a range of ways to describe the figures. However, vocabulary control is limited by frequent spelling errors and unnatural word combinations, such as “significantally,” “preferd,” “intaked,” and “sugar enlarged.” Phrases like “vital for dinner” and “lunch favored middle usage” do not express the chart data naturally and may make the meaning harder to understand. Prefer standard reporting language and use it consistently: meals “account for” a percentage, or a nutrient is “consumed” in a meal. Accurate spelling and collocation would make your comparisons clearer and more appropriate for an academic report.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including contrasts introduced by “while” and “whereas.” Nevertheless, grammatical errors occur across the response and sometimes make relationships between ideas unclear. For example, “all of them may be unhealthy if it consumed much more” has an unclear pronoun and faulty conditional structure; “breakfast and snack both shows” has subject–verb disagreement; and “which was least usage” is not a complete, well-formed clause. Sentence boundaries and comma use are also inconsistent, particularly where a new sentence begins after a comma. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement, articles, and clause construction, and keep comparisons in complete sentences. These improvements would allow your range of sentence forms to communicate the data more reliably.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.