Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Flying from one place to another have made life easier and more convenient . While some people have made a decision not to take flights every year or should stop flying. According to my perspective, this thought should be deal properly because there are many disadvantages of not taking benefit from the flight.

Flights have made life easier for many individuals including businessmen, students and visitors. People always opt for convenient and fastest modes of travelling rather than longer waits. For example, when a businessman needs to travel to attend bussiness meeting, he will always try to book a comfort flight that consumes less time to reach destiny. So that, they can consume the extra time in more productive manner in other things.

There are few environmental benefits of not taking flights. The atmosphere is already polluted and aircrafts are increasing the pollutant chemicals in the environment. If the flying aircrafts stops , it may benefit the environment but a little. Because, the main cause of pollution is millions of vehicles all over the world but not aircrafts. By doing so, the people can't travel abroad and will make their lives more problematic.

To put it in a nutshell, Flying must not be stopped but it can be reduced. People should avoid unnecessary travel so that they initiate the positive step towards environment. Aircrafts are the fastest mode of travelling. People are usually depend on them due to the comfort and convenient travel.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You give a recognisable position: flying should not stop completely, but unnecessary trips should be reduced. You also address both sides by mentioning convenience for business travellers and the environmental effect of aircraft emissions. However, the response only partially develops the comparison the question asks for. The environmental benefit is dismissed as small, mainly because road vehicles are more numerous, without explaining the relative impact or supporting this claim with evidence. The disadvantages for businesses and individuals are also treated briefly, and the conclusion does not clearly weigh these against environmental gains. The response is 7 words below the required minimum, which further limits the development of your ideas. Explain your position more fully and support each main point with a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic, useful structure: an introduction, paragraphs on convenience and environmental effects, and a conclusion. This makes the main topic generally easy to follow. Some links between ideas are less clear, however. For example, “So that, they can consume the extra time” is an awkward connection to the preceding sentence, and “By doing so” does not clearly identify the action being discussed. The argument also moves from the limited environmental benefit to the difficulty of travelling abroad without fully explaining the relationship between them. Use clearer topic sentences and connect each example explicitly to your position. More consistent referencing and transitions would make the progression less abrupt.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “polluted,” “pollutant chemicals,” “productive,” and “unnecessary travel.” There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “modes of travelling” and “environmental benefits.” However, the range is limited and some word choices or collocations are noticeably inaccurate, which can make the meaning less natural. For instance, “reach destiny” is not an appropriate way to describe arriving at a destination, and “comfort flight” is an awkward phrase. Spelling errors such as “bussiness” also reduce accuracy. Build a wider set of natural expressions for discussing emissions, travel convenience, and economic effects, and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a conditional example beginning “when a businessman needs to travel” and a contrast introduced by “While.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to affect clarity. For example, “Flying from one place to another have made” has subject–verb disagreement, while “the flying aircrafts stops” has an incorrect verb form and agreement. The opening fragment beginning “While some people…” is not joined to a complete main clause, and “People are usually depend” uses an incorrect verb construction. Review agreement, complete sentence formation, and verb patterns. Aim to produce accurate simple sentences before adding more complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.