Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Many people have decided to decrease traveling for business dealing ,personal work or to travel alone in a year .I believes that it is beneficial for the environment as well as for their personal and corporate expense.

In the 20 century we can communicate to anyone through multiple platforms such as botim ,google meeting and microsoft team. It is less expensive and eco friendly rather than to use plane to move abroad.It will reduce the pollution , carbon foot prints and global warming.Nowadays the owner of my office prefers to have a meeting on pc with the client and they are planning every thing for the future consignment including the custom clearance.

The outcome of remote working is favourable for both planet and individual.This can minimize the office expense and protect the environment of world. Without traveling we can reduce the usage of petroleum goods.In the meantime we can hire someone who can manage or train the staff to operate such platforms.In my office there is an IT team who manage all those meeting which is held online.

As per my opinion the environment benefits from reducing the plane usage can be overwhemling for every individual or any sector . It saves the cost of travelling and office expense.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You give a clear overall view that reducing flights benefits the environment and can also save money, and you include relevant examples such as online meetings and your office’s IT team. However, the response addresses the comparison only partially: it explains environmental gains and some cost savings, but does not develop the disadvantages for individuals or businesses, such as reduced face-to-face contact, travel-dependent jobs, or limits to remote communication. The position is stated, but the claim that the benefits are “overwhelming” is not supported with enough explanation or evidence. The response is also 41 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop both sides. Extend the discussion with specific examples and a fuller comparison of benefits and drawbacks.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an opening position, paragraphs about online communication and its effects, and a concluding opinion. The examples about your office help connect the discussion to a real context. However, progression is limited because the paragraphs largely repeat the benefits of remote meetings and reduced travel rather than developing distinct points, especially on disadvantages. Connections between ideas are sometimes abrupt; for example, “In the meantime” does not clearly show how hiring someone to manage platforms follows from reducing flights. Some sentences also combine several points without clear links. Organise the body around separate arguments—environmental benefits, effects on individuals, and effects on businesses—and use linking phrases that show the precise relationship between each idea.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “carbon footprints,” “global warming,” “remote working,” “client,” and “custom clearance,” so the reader can follow the main subject. There is some attempt to use more specific language, but several choices are inaccurate or awkward, such as “business dealing,” “personal work,” “petroleum goods,” and “the environment of world.” Spelling and word-form errors, including “overwhemling” and “foot prints,” also reduce precision. Some wording is repetitive, particularly references to reducing travel, protecting the environment, and saving costs. Build a more accurate range of collocations for this topic—for example, “business travel,” “fossil fuels,” and “environmental impact”—and check spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, and the main message is generally understandable. However, control is uneven, particularly with subject–verb agreement, articles, and sentence construction. Examples include “I believes,” “the owner … prefers … and they are planning,” and “all those meeting which is held online.” The opening sentence also lacks clear grammatical structure, while punctuation and spacing are inconsistent, as in “business dealing ,personal work.” Most sentences follow basic patterns, so the range remains limited and attempts to combine ideas are not always accurate. Practise forming complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, check singular and plural agreement, and use commas and full stops to separate ideas. Reading each sentence aloud can help identify awkward constructions.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.