Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In recent years, reducing the number of flying or flying altogether has become a widely disscussed issue in many parts of the world. While some people believe that reducing the number of flights every year will be beneficial, while others argue that it will be benficial to stop flying altogether. From my opinion stop to fly altogether is a better option to think about, i strongly believe that flying is much necessary in the modern world to explore and fulfil your needs such as meetings,events,etc....., and this essay will disscuss the main reasons behind my perspective.

To begin with, one of the main reasons people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year is important that the escalation of innovation, you can attend meetings online on different platforms like zoom and etc..., this is mainly because of the lockdown we all hav witnessed in pandemic corona virus, as a result all of us started considering these platforms rather than spending money and time to fly. Therefore it is evident that reducing the number of times they fly every year is absolutely worth it.

Furthermore, another significant point to consider is without skipping the numbers to fly it is more helpful in many situations to stop flying altogether, in other words some situations are a kind of crucial in which your presence matters, for example i would say just imagine you are living abroad and you have to visit your country in emergency so flying alone is much helpful than taking all your family with you until unless you are planning any vaccation. which will definetely result as saving a lot of money of yours. This clearly demonstrates why stop to fly altogether can be benificial for you,

In conclusion, there are different point of views about the topic, i firmly believe that stop to fly altogether is consequently a better option.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You give a clear opinion that flying should continue when necessary, and you include relevant examples such as online meetings and an emergency visit to your home country. However, the response only partially answers the central comparison: it does not clearly weigh environmental benefits against disadvantages for both individuals and businesses. The opening also contradicts itself, first presenting stopping altogether as your preferred option, then arguing that flying is necessary. The discussion of online meetings supports reducing flights, but the emergency example is confusing and does not explain the effects on businesses or the environmental benefits in sufficient detail. State one consistent position and develop both sides of the comparison with specific reasons and examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “Furthermore” and “In conclusion” make the intended structure visible. However, the ideas do not progress clearly: the first paragraph argues for reducing flights, while the next shifts to stopping flights altogether and then describes a case where flying is needed. Several linking phrases are inaccurate or do not show the relationship between ideas, including “without skipping the numbers to fly” and “This clearly demonstrates why stop to fly altogether…”. The conclusion repeats a position without resolving the earlier contradiction. Organise each paragraph around one clear point, connect examples directly to that point, and use fewer, more precise transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “platforms,” “lockdown,” “emergency” and “saving money,” so the reader can generally identify the subject of your examples. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the meaning difficult to follow. For example, “the escalation of innovation” does not clearly express the growth of online meeting technology, and “without skipping the numbers to fly” is unclear. There are also noticeable spelling errors such as “disscussed,” “benficial,” “vaccation” and “definetely.” Build a more precise range for discussing emissions, travel costs and business needs, and check spelling and collocations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including a cause-and-effect structure with “as a result” and a conditional example beginning “if you are living abroad.” However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors recur in verb forms, sentence boundaries, articles and punctuation. Examples include “reducing the number of flying,” “stop to fly,” and the run-on opening sentence beginning “While some people believe…”. The emergency example also contains an incomplete or poorly controlled sentence, followed by a lowercase “which.” These problems sometimes make relationships between ideas hard to understand. Practise accurate clause construction and verb patterns, then proofread for sentence boundaries, capitalization and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.