Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In recent years, there has been ongoing debate about whether some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether. According to my point of view it is better to reduce the average number to flights for another country instead of stopping it at once.

Firstly, if we decreased the number of flights that fly every year then it has various advantages in the sense of environmental heaith. For instance, the global warming is now become the major problem all around the world and if we manage our flights yearly then we overcome the air pollution that caused by air transportation.Because healthy atmosphere is more important for humans rather to explore new side of the world.

On the other hand, tourists are the biggest investors for every country that provide many advantages for economical growth. However, if we stop travellers for visits then we face enormous problems related to individual and businesses. For example, if tourists visit our country frequently then they book their accomodation and explore different places that automatically runs and flourished our bussinesses. But if we band such kind of activity then we face hardles in terms of economical growth.

In conclusion, if the government should consider it and maintain a balance between travelling and environmental problems then we easily overcome these innovations of life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You present a relevant position: you favour reducing flights rather than stopping them completely, and you discuss environmental effects alongside tourism and business. However, the response only partially answers the key question of whether the environmental benefits outweigh the disadvantages. The conclusion recommends a balance but does not clearly state which side outweighs the other, and the supporting points remain general—for example, the link between fewer flights and reduced pollution is asserted rather than explained. The business paragraph gives a relevant tourism example, but individual disadvantages receive little attention. The response is also below the required 250 words: 208 words, with 19 words copied from the prompt excluded. Develop both sides with specific reasoning and examples, then make your overall judgement explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs signalled by “Firstly” and “On the other hand,” and a conclusion. This helps the reader identify the environmental argument and the tourism/business argument. However, progression within paragraphs is limited, and some links are unclear or mechanical. For instance, “Because healthy atmosphere is more important…” is not smoothly connected to the preceding sentence, while “if we stop travellers for visits” does not clearly express the relationship between travel restrictions and business effects. The conclusion introduces “innovations of life,” which does not follow clearly from the argument. Use clearer topic sentences, connect each example directly to its claim, and ensure pronouns and references identify their meaning.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “global warming,” “air pollution,” “tourists,” “accommodation,” and “economical growth,” so the main subject is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate or awkward choices make parts difficult to interpret. Examples include “average number to flights,” “explore new side of the world,” and “overcome these innovations of life.” There are also noticeable spelling errors, such as “heaith,” “accomodation,” “bussinesses,” and “hardles.” Aim for precise collocations and check spelling carefully; for example, describe reducing the “number of flights” and “visiting new places.” Repeating “if” constructions also limits the variety of expression.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, particularly conditional forms such as “if we manage our flights yearly” and “if tourists visit our country frequently.” However, complex structures are often faulty, and frequent errors sometimes make the intended meaning difficult to follow. For example, “the global warming is now become” has an incorrect verb form, and “the air pollution that caused by air transportation” is missing an auxiliary verb. The opening sentence also has an unclear construction: “According to my point of view it is better to reduce…” Practise accurate conditional clauses and verb forms, and check articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries. Shorter, correctly controlled sentences would make your reasoning clearer while you build range.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.