Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, flying from one place to another is popular way of transportation as it reduces time of travel. People come to the point that they should reduce to use planes as their way of transport every year or just don't fly altogether. I don't think so that by reducing the use of airplanes can benefit more than the disadvantages it cause on the nation. I will discuss both views in this essay.

The advantages of reducing the use of airplanes for transportation are substantial as it can benefit environment. Airplanes and Helicopter can pollute the environment by carbon dioxide emission which can cause several environmental problems such as global warming and climate change. Therefore by reducing or stopping to fly can be crucial for environment as it benefit the nation.

In contrast, it can pose several serious issues to the people and the nation as well. It can affect the business such as airlines as their customers started to reduce and it can cause them lose. Another disadvantage is that it can effect people by increasing the time of their travelling. For example, if a person can travel through places in 1 hour on plane then the same person might travel in 5 to 6 hours on the same location. so it can cause serious work related problems and also destroy families trip to abroad.

From my perspective, this view has more disadvantages than advantages as it create several problems for the public. Although airplanes can cause environmental problems, it can make travelling easy for people to commute around the world. So environmental benefits does not surplus the disadvantages of this development.

In conclusion, by reducing the use of planes cannot reduce the number of problems faced by the public but the use of air transport can really benefits the nations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you believe the environmental gains do not outweigh the disadvantages, and you address both environmental effects and consequences for people and businesses. The point about aviation emissions causing climate change is relevant, while the example comparing a one-hour flight with a five-to-six-hour journey helps illustrate the personal cost. However, the business impact is only briefly stated—airlines may lose customers and money—with no explanation of wider effects or supporting example. The environmental case is also general, and the conclusion claims air transport benefits nations without showing how this outweighs the environmental harm. Develop these points with specific reasoning and examples, and make the comparison between benefits and disadvantages more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for benefits and disadvantages, a stated opinion, and a conclusion. The progression from environmental effects to personal and business costs is easy to follow, and signposts such as “In contrast” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. This organisation is effective, though some linking is mechanical: “I will discuss both views” announces the plan rather than advancing the argument, and “From my perspective” repeats the position already given in the introduction. Some references are also unclear, particularly “it” in “it can cause them lose,” where the reader must infer what causes the loss. Use more precise references and connect each example directly to the claim it supports to make the flow more natural.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “carbon dioxide emission,” “global warming,” “climate change,” and “work related problems.” There are also some attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “substantial” and “pose several serious issues.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive: “popular way of transportation,” “reduce to use planes,” and “destroy families trip” do not sound natural, while “benefit” and “problems” recur without much variation. These choices sometimes make the intended meaning less precise, although the overall argument remains understandable. Build a wider set of natural collocations for transport, emissions, and economic effects, and check whether each chosen phrase fits its context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional comparison (“if a person can travel… then the same person might travel…”) and a concession beginning “Although airplanes can cause environmental problems.” The main meaning is generally recoverable, but some grammatical errors occur across the response. Examples include missing or incorrect articles in “is popular way,” “the environment,” and “on the same location”; agreement and verb-form problems in “it benefit,” “it create,” and “can really benefits”; and an incomplete construction in “by reducing the use of planes cannot reduce.” These errors affect accuracy even when they do not prevent understanding. Practise article use, subject–verb agreement, and complete sentence patterns, then proofread each sentence for a clear subject and correctly formed verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.