Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.0)

Several individual have unionly talk about the number of times they fly every year or to avoid flying altogether.In my opinion the benefits is more as compare to drawbacks.In this devolpment the drawbacks for persons and financial works provides the environmental benefits.

In detail,in the past every persons are stable in our own country,now numerous individuals are in this efforts to keep ourselves and stable in foreign country.In the upcoming years the new generation will completely in this struggle how to leave country quickly.For instance the flying is almost trending nowdays as compare to previous era.

On the other hand,flying much is greater impact in our society and its may cause negative feedback on environmental devolpment.The drawbacks is more as compare to benefits due to the fact that,the teangers are in this effort to keep ourselves outer states.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.5

The response gives a position—“the benefits is more as compare to drawbacks”—but does not explain the environmental benefits or clearly weigh them against the disadvantages for individuals and businesses. The discussion instead focuses on people leaving their country and the popularity of flying, so it only partly addresses the question; the final point about teenagers travelling to other states is also unclear and unsupported. The response contains 128 words, below the required 250, and this substantially limits the opportunity to develop relevant reasons and examples. To improve, explain specific effects such as reduced aviation emissions, then compare these with impacts on travel access, tourism, or business connections, supporting each point with a clear example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 3.5

There is a basic attempt to organise the response into an introduction and two body paragraphs, and phrases such as “For instance” and “On the other hand” signal examples and contrast. However, the ideas do not progress in a clear argument: the first body paragraph shifts from people being “stable” in their country to moving abroad, without showing how this supports the stated position. The contrast marker also introduces a point that does not clearly oppose the earlier claim. Some sentences run together, and the relationship between ideas is difficult to follow. Use one paragraph for environmental benefits and another for disadvantages, with each paragraph developing a single main point and clear links between its sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response attempts vocabulary related to the topic, including “environmental development,” “negative feedback,” and “trending,” and uses some relevant terms such as “flying” and “benefits.” However, several choices are inaccurate or unclear, which makes the argument difficult to understand. For example, “financial works” does not clearly express a business-related disadvantage, while “stable in our own country” and “outer states” do not convey a precise meaning in this context. Spelling and word-form errors such as “devolpment” and “teangers” also reduce accuracy. Build a more precise topic vocabulary and check that each phrase expresses the intended idea; for instance, refer to “aviation emissions,” “business travel,” and “international tourism.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response includes attempts at both simple and more extended sentences, such as “The drawbacks is more as compare to benefits due to the fact that…” However, control of sentence structure and basic grammar is inconsistent, and errors often make the intended meaning hard to follow. Examples include “Several individual have,” “the benefits is,” and “every persons are,” where subject–verb agreement and plural forms are not controlled. The sentence beginning “In the upcoming years” also lacks a clear grammatical completion. Punctuation is sometimes missing after full stops, as in the opening. Practise accurate simple sentences first, then add subordinate clauses; check agreement, articles, verb forms, and sentence boundaries during proofreading.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.