Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, certain people have restricted their transportation through aeroplanes in several aspects like reduce the number of times they fly every year or avoid acompanying their companions. I strongly believe that the environmental benefits of this progression overweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses mainly due to less air pollution and saving resources on the earth. The disadvantage is that this will reduce the number of passengers, which eventually negatively affects airline's profit margin. Thus, the following essay will further discuss this idea with examples.

If some people restrict their transportation through aeroplanes, airlines may have reduced number of passengers. Sometimes, they may have to reduce or cancel several trips to certain destinations. This will ultimately lower their profit margins, as they have to cover up their regular expenses, such as wages and maintainence. However, this will be negatively affects their economical targets. In worst case scenario, this can be overcome upto some extent by reducing the number of staff and aeroplanes.

Nevertheless, the environmental pollution is not something that we can overturn within days, weeks or months. Sometimes, it may take decades to adjust to the normal conditions. Aeroplanes use fuel as their energy source. During fuel combustion, greenhouse gasses like carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide release to the environment. These gasses may ultimately result in global warming, ozone layer depletion and other extream weather conditions. As the number of passengers increase, airlines have to flew more aeroplanes, which burn more fuel and there by release these toxic gasses in huge quantities. Hence, it is our duty to restrain from unwanted traveling and protect the environment. Another important aspect is that the fossil fuel is a very limited resource on the earth. It is considered as a non-renewable energy source, which takes ages to replenished. Scientists have predicted that the fossil fuel resovoires will be finished by another 100 years. Therefore, it is our responsibility to carefully use these limited resources, while saving them for our younger generations.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that limiting transportation through aeroplanes affect positively to the environment, although it comes with an economical burden to the businesses, which can be managable upto certain extent.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you believe the environmental benefits outweigh the disadvantages, and you address both sides by discussing airline profits and the effects of aviation on pollution and fuel use. The environmental case is supported with relevant explanation, including how more flights burn more fuel, while the business disadvantage is acknowledged through reduced passengers, cancelled trips and operating costs. However, the business impact is developed less fully than the environmental argument, and the effects on individuals are not really explored. Some claims, such as the prediction that fossil-fuel reserves will be exhausted within 100 years, would be stronger with qualification or a clearer basis. Develop the individual consequences and explain more directly why the environmental gains outweigh the economic costs.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, separate paragraphs consider business costs and environmental benefits, and the conclusion restates your position. Linking expressions such as “However,” “Nevertheless,” “Hence” and “Therefore” help show relationships between ideas, and the progression from flight numbers to fuel use is generally easy to follow. This meets the lower-band expectations securely and shows some flexibility in organising the argument. At times, however, transitions feel mechanical, and the opening sentence is difficult to follow, which weakens the initial progression. The business paragraph also ends abruptly with a possible response to falling profits, without connecting that point clearly to your overall judgement. Use clearer topic sentences and more explicit links between each paragraph’s evidence and your conclusion.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “profit margins,” “greenhouse gases,” “global warming,” “non-renewable energy source” and “fossil fuel.” These choices allow you to discuss both the economic and environmental dimensions, and some less common terms are attempted. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “restricted their transportation through aeroplanes,” “overweigh the disadvantages,” and “economical targets.” Spelling errors including “maintainence,” “extream” and “resovoires” also reduce precision. These issues do not prevent the reader from understanding your main points, but they limit the naturalness and control of the vocabulary. Prefer established expressions such as “reduce air travel,” “outweigh the disadvantages” and “financial targets,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including conditional structures (“If some people restrict…”) and clauses explaining causes and consequences. Most ideas remain understandable, and the response shows an effort to vary sentence patterns. Some grammatical errors nevertheless recur. For example, “this will be negatively affects” combines incompatible verb forms; “airlines have to flew” should use the base form after “have to”; and “which takes ages to replenished” needs a passive form. There are also issues with articles, agreement and sentence construction, as in “In worst case scenario” and “the fossil fuel resovoires will be finished.” These errors rarely obscure the intended meaning, but greater control of verb forms and sentence patterns is needed. Proofread each clause, especially after modal verbs and linking words.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.