Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Several person have make decision to reduce the amount of times they fly every twelve months or to stop flying together.This essay will analyze the benefits and drawbacks of this, before a logical conclusion is drawn on which side is heavier.

To begin with there are numerous benefits of reduce the number of fly every year. Firstly it can reduce pollution in climate change. By reduce flying travel it help very much in our weather and environment. From that flying trnsportation it effect so much in our environmwnt by producing different type of emission in air and from that cause so much pollution in our air which damage our weather in environment. In addittion, having reduce flying transportation help to earn money for middle class people which helps in their basic needs.For instance, a person who drive bus to earn money for their children and parents to fulfill their basic needs and it helps so much to them from reduce flying transporation.

However, drawbacks associated with it cannot be ignored too. First of all, reducing flying transportation affect in financial loss for bussines person. For business person who has to deal a big amount and have to go far away for busines meeting that type of person had negative issue by reducing flying transportation. Moreover, for travelling person who travell for making diffrent type of vlog also had problem by reducing flying transportation.

In conclusion, although there are both type of situation by reducing flying transportation. But in my opinion, by reducing flying transportation it can many negative impacts because for business meeting, for emergency works we have to travel by flying traportation . So , flying travel is very much important in our life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both sides of the question and give a clear final view that the disadvantages of reducing flights are greater, referring to business meetings and emergencies. However, the position is not consistently clear: the introduction promises to weigh the sides, while the body gives more space to environmental benefits before the conclusion favours continued flying. Several points are only loosely connected to the issue. For example, the claim that fewer flights help middle-class people earn money is illustrated with a bus driver, but the link between this example and reducing air travel is not explained. Develop relevant points with a clear cause-and-effect explanation and directly compare the environmental gains with the effects on individuals and businesses.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for benefits and drawbacks, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “To begin with,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help readers identify these sections. However, progression within paragraphs is often difficult to follow because ideas are repeated or linked unclearly. The environmental paragraph moves from pollution to weather and then to a bus driver’s income without explaining the connections. The conclusion also introduces emergencies without developing this point earlier. Some linking phrases, including “although there are both type of situation… But,” do not form a clear relationship between ideas. Organise each paragraph around one main point, explain it in sequence, and use referencing and transitions more precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “pollution,” “emission,” “financial loss,” and “business meeting,” so the reader can identify the main subject. However, the range is limited and several phrases are repeated, especially “reducing flying transportation.” Word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unclear, as in “reduce pollution in climate change,” “which side is heavier,” and “negative issue.” There are also noticeable spelling errors, such as “trnsportation,” “environmwnt,” and “diffrent,” which reduce the clarity and control of the writing. Build a more precise set of topic expressions and check spelling; for example, distinguish between reducing emissions and addressing climate change.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a relative clause in “a person who drive bus…” and a contrastive opening with “although.” However, complex structures are often faulty, and frequent errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction sometimes make the meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “Several person have make decision,” “it help,” and “reducing flying transportation affect.” The final sentence, “although there are both type of situation… But,” is also incomplete in its construction. Practise forming accurate subject–verb patterns and complete sentences before adding complexity. For instance, use “Several people have decided…” and ensure that a dependent clause beginning with “although” is joined to a complete main clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.