Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is undeniable that flights play a pivotal role in individuals personal life also in businesses. It has made the transportation much easier than before, but taking less flights for the shake of environmental benefits is not a wise option I have to say. The environmental profits, assumed for taking less flights can never outweigh the cons will be faced by individuals and businesses in the future.

To start with, in recent times, businesses and trades are mostly depended on flights. For the advancement of technology, this world turned into a global village, where we can easily run free market trade. For this, the owners have to travel a lot, from one country to another within a very short time. This can only be possible with taking flights, people can move out of the boundary by taking flights within a very short time. That is why, owners can make deals going another parts of the world for their company, which is profitable for their comapany, and bring remmitance for their country.

Furthermore, flights are pivotal to individuals for moving another country. For instance, Poland dose not have their embassy in Bangladesh. The students who are willing to go poland for study or visit purpose, they have to visit other countries such as Malaysia, Vietnam or Singapore to face the embassy. For this, they can use flights to reach the third country as soon as possible, and submit their documets in the embassy for their visa, this explains the practical uses of flights.

Regarding environment benefits, it is not as much as expected. A recent survey by American Institute of Technology, illustrates that everyday around 52 million people taking flights for different purposes. A large quantitty of Carbon is emmiting everyday. To stop this, the scientists should focus more on the engines, which burn less fuel compared to current engines.

To sum up, it can be reestated that taking less flights for the betterment of environment is not a wise option. Better to think about the fuel efficient engines which are convinient for environment.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you argue that reducing flights would bring environmental benefits, but that these do not outweigh the disadvantages for people and businesses. You address both sides, using international trade and students travelling to visa appointments as examples, and you acknowledge aviation emissions before proposing more efficient engines. However, the comparison is not fully developed. The business paragraph explains why flights are convenient and commercially useful, but does not show clearly what harm would result from reducing their frequency or why that harm outweighs the environmental gains. The environmental discussion is also brief, and the survey figure is not connected to a balanced evaluation. Develop the consequences on both sides and explain your weighing more explicitly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs discuss practical uses, a further paragraph considers emissions, and the conclusion restates your position. Sequencing phrases such as “To start with,” “Furthermore,” and “To sum up” help readers follow this progression. This coherent arrangement is a strength. To make the organisation more effective, ensure each paragraph advances the comparison in the question rather than mainly describing the usefulness of flights. Some links are mechanical, and references such as “For this” do not always make the relationship between ideas precise. The environmental paragraph could also connect more directly to the earlier examples and to your final judgement, creating a more continuous line of reasoning.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “global village,” “free market trade,” “remittance,” “carbon,” and “fuel efficient engines,” which helps communicate the subject. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “pivotal role” and “environmental benefits.” However, inaccurate word choice, collocation, and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less natural: “for the shake of environmental benefits,” “remittance for their country,” and “a large quantity of Carbon is emitting” are examples. Several expressions are repeated, particularly “taking flights” and “very short time.” Aim for more precise, natural combinations and check spelling carefully; for example, use “reduce air travel” and “aviation emissions” where appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a relative clause in “where we can easily run free market trade” and a conditional structure in “which burn less fuel compared to current engines.” The main ideas are generally understandable, but errors in sentence construction and verb forms recur. For example, “flights play a pivotal role in individuals personal life also in businesses” lacks clear grammatical links, while “businesses and trades are mostly depended on flights” uses an incorrect passive form. There are also problems with articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries, as in “Poland dose not have their embassy in Bangladesh.” Work on building accurate clauses first, then combine them with conjunctions and relative clauses; check subject–verb agreement and punctuation when editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.