Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

In recent era of growing climate awarness, for prevent the number of times, few things are more crucial than the environmental benefits of this development. In many developed and developing countries, a substantial amount of money and effort allocated to environmental programs, as it often necessitates the use of various resources such as technology, international expertise, research centres, and monitoring systems. nowadays, many would agree that contemporary society has trancended it's traditional boundaries and will soon become boundless in its pursuit of environmental reduction for the enrichment of individuals and bussinesses. Nevertheless I firmly believe that environmental facilities of reducing their fly times all the year and releif flying altogther has both positive and negative impect for bulkiness and residants.

Naturally, solving environmrntal problems in the form of development is consedered more essential for both local peoples and bussiness as, creating inexhaustible facilities for livig standers that ae not available from other sources. Moreover, this demonstrates unparalleled benefitis for citizens and also bussinesses, permeating and enhancing every conceivable sector of society. Since people seek development and fulfillment of through the prevent flying altogether it imperative to elevate modern living standers. If this adopted by governments and individuals alike, many people stand to benefit significantly. In nations such as paris climate agreement, for instance, have emerged as pivotal models for uniting nations and delivering enhanced environmental protections.

On the other hand, there are several issue with reduce flying altogether solely on global solutions that make us consider alternatives. Under certain circumstances, governments shy away from international cooperation due to a range of challenges, such as natinal interests, financial limitations, political disagreements, and unequal responsibilities among countries. While global agreements are widely embraced, many developing nations frequently contend with profound with resource shortages and domestic pressures when striving to implement international commitments. Therefore, the notion of stop flying altogether benefits for individuals and bussinesses is not always appealing but remains uderstandable.

In conclusion, it is responsibility of governments to evaluate the role of environmental benefits deremine whether depending exclusively on one approach will do more harm than good. Thus, it is evident that fostering an interest in this efforts , where nations address domestic environmental issues while participating in global solutions, is far more beneficial.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt regarding whether the environmental benefits of reducing or stopping flying outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses, but it does so in a somewhat tangential and muddled manner. The student attempts to present a position in the introduction ('I firmly believe that environmental facilities... has both positive and negative impect'), but the development of ideas is heavily obscured by confusing phrasing and non-sequiturs, such as referencing the Paris climate agreement as a nation. While some relevant points are raised—such as global cooperation challenges and economic impacts—the arguments are under-developed and lack clear logical progression toward answering the specific prompt. Consequently, this performance falls under Band 5.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The text is divided into four paragraphs, providing a basic structural layout. However, the logical progression is frequently disrupted by confusing sentences and abrupt transitions. Cohesive devices are used awkwardly or inaccurately (for example, 'In many developed and developing countries, a substantial amount of money...' leading into unrelated environmental infrastructure claims). Referencing is often unclear, leaving the reader struggling to connect ideas between sentences and paragraphs. Paragraphing is present, but internal cohesion is weak, placing the response firmly at Band 5.

Lexical Resource — Band 4.0

The vocabulary range is limited and frequently inappropriate for an academic essay. There are numerous instances of awkward word choices, inappropriate collocations, and spelling errors throughout the text (e.g., 'awarness', 'trancended', 'bussinesses', 'impect', 'residants', 'deremine'). Attempts to use less common vocabulary (such as 'transcended', 'inexhaustible', 'pivotal models') result in unnatural phrasing that impedes communication. The control of word formation is weak, corresponding to a Band 4 level.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.0

The response displays a very limited range of grammatical structures, and attempts at complex sentences frequently fail due to severe structural errors. There are frequent and dense errors in punctuation, subject-verb agreement, articles, and preposition use (e.g., 'In recent era', 'for prevent the number of times', 'it's traditional boundaries', 'Since people seek development and fulfillment of through the prevent flying altogether it imperative'). These errors constantly strain the reader and distort the intended meaning, keeping the score at Band 4.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.