Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In the recent era of growing climate awareness, to prevent the number of times, few things are more crucial than the environmental benefits of this development. In many developed and developing countries, a substantial amount of money and efforts allocated to environmental programs, as it often necessitates the use of various resources such as technology, international expertise, research centres, and monitoring systems. Nowadays, many would agree that contemporary society has transcended its traditional boundaries and will soon become boundless in its pursuit of environmental reduction for the enrichment of individuals and businesses. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that environmental facilities of reducing their fly times all the year and rilief flying altogether has both positive and negative impact for business and residents.

Naturally, solving environmental problems in the form of development is considered more essential for both local people and bussiness it is creates inexhaustible facilities for living standards that are not available from other sources. Moreover, this demonstrates unparalleled benefitis for citizens and also businesses, permeating and enhancing every conceivable sector of society. Since people seek development and fulfillment through the prevent flying altogether it imperative to elevate modern living standards. It is adopted by governments and individuals alike, many people stand to benefit significantly. In nations such as Paris, climate agreement, for instance, have emerged as pivotal models for uniting nations and delivering enhanced environmental protections.

On the other hand, there are several issues with reducing flying altogether solely on global solutions that make us consider alternatives. Under certain circumstances, governments shy away from international cooperation due to a range of challenges, such as natinal interests, financial limitations, political disagreements, and unequal responsibilities among countries. While global agreements are widely embraced, many developing nations frequently contend with profound with resource shortages and domestic pressures when striving to implement international commitments. Therefore, the notion of stop flying altogether benefits for individuals and businesses is not always appealing but remains uderstandable.

In conclusion, it is responsibility of governments to evaluate the role of environmental benefits deremine whether depending exclusively on one approach will do more harm than good. Thus, it is evident that fostering an interest in this efforts , where nations address domestic environmental issues while participating in global solutions, is far more beneficial.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response attempts to address the prompt regarding whether the environmental benefits of reducing or stopping flying outweigh disadvantages for individuals and businesses. However, the position is somewhat obscured by abstract language and tangents about general environmental development. While the writer touches on both positive and negative impacts, the arguments lack clear development and focus specifically on the prompt's core question of air travel. Phrases such as 'prevent flying altogether' and 'environmental facilities of reducing their fly times' show that the writer has grasped the topic, but the ideas remain under-developed and occasionally confusing. This falls under the Band 5 descriptors, as the task is addressed only partially and the position is not always clear.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is organised into four paragraphs, following a standard introduction, body, and conclusion structure. However, the overall progression is frequently disrupted by awkward transitions and confusing sentence construction. For example, the sentence beginning with 'Naturally, solving environmental problems in the form of development...' lacks clear logical connection to the preceding paragraph. Cohesive devices are attempted, such as 'Nevertheless' and 'On the other hand', but referencing is often unclear, as seen in pronouns whose antecedents are ambiguous. Paragraphing is present, but internal cohesion is weak. This aligns with Band 5 performance.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is a mix of basic and attempted higher-level terms, but frequent inaccuracies in word choice, collocation, and phrasing significantly impede communication. Expressions such as 'prevent the number of times', 'environmental facilities', 'rilief flying altogether', and 'prevent flying altogether' demonstrate a limited control of lelexis. There are also typographical and spelling errors like 'bussiness', 'benefitis', 'natinal', and 'uderstandable'. Although the writer attempts less common vocabulary, the persistent errors place this text solidly at Band 5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but frequent grammatical errors cause difficulty for the reader throughout the essay. Many sentences are structurally unsound or incomplete, such as 'Since people seek development and fulfillment through the prevent flying altogether it imperative to elevate modern living standards.' There are persistent issues with subject-verb agreement, preposition use, and word forms. While there is an attempt at complex clauses, the high frequency of errors means that error-free sentences are scarce. This matches the Band 5 descriptors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.