Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In the recent era of growing climate awareness, to prevent the number of times, few things are more crucial than the environmental benefits of this development. In many developed and developing countries, a substantial amount of money and efforts is allocated to environmental programs, as it is often necessitates the use of various resources such as technology, international expertise, research centres, and monitoring systems. Nowadays, many would agree that contemporary society has transcended its traditional boundaries and will soon become boundless in its pursuit of environmental reduction for the enrichment of individuals and businesses. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that environmental facilities of reducing their fly times all the year and relief flying altogether has both positive and negative impacts for business and residents.

Naturally, solving environmental problems in the form of development is to considered more essential for both local people and bussiness it is creates inexhaustible facilities for living standards that are not available from other sources. Moreover, this demonstrates unparalleled benefits for citizens and also businesses, it is permeating and enhancing every conceivable sector of society. Since people seek development and fulfillment through the prevent flying altogether it imperative to elevate modern living standards. It is adopted by governments and individuals alike, many people stand to benefit significantly. In nations such as Paris, climate agreement, for instance, have emerged as pivotal models for uniting nations and delivering enhanced environmental protections.

On the other hand, there are several issues with reducing flying altogether solely on global solutions that make us to consider alternatives. Under certain circumstances, governments shy away from international cooperation due to a range of challenges, such as natinal interests, financial limitations, political disagreements, and unequal responsibilities among countries. While global agreements are widely embraced, many developing nations frequently contend with profound with resource shortages and domestic pressures when striving to implement international commitments. Therefore, the notion of stop flying altogether benefits for individuals and businesses is not always appealing but remains understandable.

In conclusion, it is the responsibility of governments to evaluate the role of environmental benefits to deremine whether depending exclusively on one approach will do more harm than good. Thus, it is evident that fostering an interest in this, where nations address domestic environmental issues while participating in global solutions, is far more beneficial.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response attempts to address the prompt regarding the environmental benefits of reducing air travel compared to disadvantages for individuals and businesses, but the central argument is frequently obscured by vague phrasing and tangential concepts. While a clear position is stated in the introduction ('I firmly believe that environmental facilities of reducing their fly times... has both positive and negative impacts'), the ideas are not fully developed or supported with concrete examples. Instead of discussing specific economic or lifestyle impacts of reduced flying (such as tourism, business meetings, or family connections), the essay drifts into abstract discussions about 'environmental programs,' 'Paris climate agreements,' and 'global solutions.' This lack of specific task focus places the response in Band 5, as the ideas remain limited and partially developed.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is divided into four paragraphs, showing an attempt at logical structure with an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, the overall progression is heavily disrupted by unnatural transitions, confusing referencing, and mechanical cohesive devices (e.g., 'Naturally, solving environmental problems...'). The relationship between sentences is frequently unclear due to semantic disconnects, particularly in the second body paragraph where transitions like 'On the other hand' introduce ideas about international cooperation rather than direct disadvantages for individuals and businesses. Paragraphing is present, but the internal logical flow makes the argument difficult to follow at times, aligning with Band 5 descriptors.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is largely repetitive and often imprecise or unnatural. Phrases such as 'environmental facilities of reducing their fly times,' 'prevent flying altogether,' and 'transcended its traditional boundaries' demonstrate a restricted range and inappropriate word choice that frequently impede communication. While there are attempts to use more complex vocabulary ('transcended,' 'unparalleled benefits,' 'pivotal models'), these are misused or awkwardly collocated. Spelling is generally accurate, but lexical control is weak, fitting the Band 5 profile where noticeable errors and limited control cause difficulty for the reader.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but a high frequency of grammatical errors severely compromises accuracy. There are numerous issues with subject-verb agreement, awkward clause structures, and incorrect prepositions (e.g., 'to prevent the number of times, few things are more crucial,' 'as it is often necessitates,' 'the notion of stop flying altogether benefits'). Sentences frequently break down structurally, making it difficult to discern the intended meaning. Because errors are frequent and often cause confusion, the writing falls below Band 6, earning a Band 4.5 or 5.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.