Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

In recent years, dome people believe that took less flight for saving the enviroment and other thinks that flight should be closed compeletly. while there are server disadvantages for this idea because there are many reasons to take flight is time avalibiity or revenue genration of airlines.

Firstly, many people prefer flights for travelling. flight takes lesser time cunsuming option than any other way. For an example , a daughter lives in abrod for their study. She got an emergency so she flied back to their hometown in less then 4 hours. Furthermore, If we choose to close the services of flight it might be costly for avilable services for example, now we have more option to take many airlince but later we have no more option we must be take avilable service and it costs more than recent times.

Moreover, main buisness of airlince are affected because that is only option for revenue genration. many compny withdraw for the airlince because of losses. Howevre there are some positive. flights takes grater fule for fly therefore number of flying are reduce there are many money save and environment are also stay safe. for example airline made major of the reson of pollution some part of airport also closed during the specific time due to clear environment.

In conclusion there are server reson that indicate that the flight are one of most usage travel area that can use for lesser time or for more comfort but they have server corns that concide more pollution.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both the environmental benefits and the disadvantages of reducing air travel for individuals and businesses, fulfilling the basic requirements of the task. However, the development of ideas is limited and at times unclear due to expression issues. For instance, the mention of revenue generation and time availability touches upon relevant points, but the supporting arguments are sparse and under-developed. The position of the writer is discernible, but the overall task fulfilment suffers from a lack of clarity in how the arguments directly weigh the environmental benefits against the disadvantages. Based on the band descriptors, this performance aligns best with a Band 5.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The text is divided into paragraphs representing an introduction, body points, and a conclusion, showing an attempt at organisation. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression. Cohesive devices are either missing, inadequate, or misused, such as 'Howevre' and 'Moreover', which leads to choppy transitions between ideas. Referencing is also unclear in places, making it difficult to follow the logical links between sentences. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion within paragraphs is faulty. This level of organisation and cohesion corresponds to a Band 5.0.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is limited and basic, with frequent spelling and word-choice errors that occasionally impede communication. Examples include 'dome' instead of 'some', 'compeletly' instead of 'completely', 'cunsuming' instead of 'consuming', 'abrod' instead of 'abroad', 'genration' instead of 'generation', and 'fule' instead of 'fuel'. While the writer attempts some less common vocabulary such as 'revenue generation', the noticeable errors in spelling and collocation place this firmly in the Band 4.0 to 5.0 range, best represented by a Band 4.5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

The response contains a very limited range of structures, with frequent grammatical errors that distort meaning and cause difficulty for the reader. There are persistent errors in verb forms, tense consistency, and subject-verb agreement throughout the text, such as 'took less flight for saving', 'she flied back', and 'flights takes grater fule for fly'. Complex sentence structures are rare and, when attempted, are almost always faulty. Punctuation is also problematic, with missing capitalisation at the start of sentences. These features match the Band 4.0 descriptors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.