Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-03
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.
Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
In this era, most people believe that to drecase number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether. Although this development offers several environmental benifits, it also has some drawbacks. This essay will discuss advatages outweigh the disadvantages for every individuals and businesses before reaching a conclusion.
One major advantage is that by lower air travel can increase the long-term environmental issues and reduce the greenhouse effects and it can contribute to addressing climate change. This because airplanes and aircrafts can release large amout of carbon emisions and pollutants into the atmosphere, Furthermore everyone should encourage sustainable transportation. For instance if more peole choose trains or buses for short-distance journeys instead of flights, fuel consumption and emisions can be reduced. Therefore, environment having good air with less eco-system damage.
On the other hand, one significant disadvantage is people having less convenient to travel anywhere over the world, moreover for businesses it is more difficult to connect with aviation and toriusm and also it can be impact our economy. This is because flying is usually the fastest way to travel long distances for the education,tourism and for employment, In addition reducing flights may could impact on businesses to make face-to-face interactions arre more difficult. As a result, people and bussinesses may impact more by making lover flights.
To conclude, despite some disadvantages, I believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages because by making lower air travel may reduce eco-system damage and greenhouse effects and also the environment will safe from that carbon emisions and fuels.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
It must be noted first that the response contains 244 words, falling short of the minimum 250-word requirement (not counting the words copied from the prompt). Regarding the content, the task is addressed only partially, reflecting a band 5 level. While you attempted to discuss whether the environmental benefits of reducing air travel outweigh the disadvantages, your position is not entirely clear throughout and the development of ideas is limited and mechanical. For example, your second paragraph attempts to explain environmental benefits by stating that 'lower air travel can increase the long-term environmental issues'—which appears to be a contradiction or vocabulary misuse—followed by underdeveloped assertions about carbon emissions. Your ideas lack sufficient support, examples are too brief, and the overall argumentation remains basic and repetitive.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
Your essay displays some organization with basic paragraphing, but there is no clear overall progression of ideas, landing the response at a band 5 level. While you used some transitional markers such as 'On the other hand' and 'To conclude', the cohesive devices are often repetitive, inaccurate, or inadequate. For instance, referencing is sometimes unclear, as seen in phrases like 'from that carbon emisions', where the demonstrative pronoun lacks a precise antecedent. Additionally, the flow between sentences is occasionally disrupted by choppy syntax and awkward transitions, meaning information does not progress smoothly from one point to the next. To move to a higher band, you need to ensure that every sentence links logically to the next and that cohesive devices are used more naturally and variedly without over-relying on basic conjunctions.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
Your lexical resource is limited and minimally adequate for the task, resulting in a band 5 rating. You demonstrate an attempt to use topic-specific vocabulary such as 'environment', 'greenhouse effects', and 'emissions', but there are noticeable errors in word choice, spelling, and word form that cause some difficulty for the reader. For example, you wrote 'drecase' instead of decrease, 'benifits' instead of benefits, and 'toriusm' instead of tourism. Furthermore, your phrasing often lacks natural collocation, such as 'making lower air travel' and 'making lover flights', which sounds unnatural in standard English. To achieve a higher band, you need to expand your vocabulary range, pay closer attention to word forms and collocations, and eliminate basic spelling errors.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
Your grammatical range and accuracy sit at a band 5 level, characterized by a limited range of sentence structures and frequent errors. While you attempt some complex sentences, these attempts are often faulty and feature grammatical breakdowns. For example, sentences such as 'One major advantage is that by lower air travel can increase the long-term environmental issues' contain confused grammatical patterns involving prepositions and verbs. You also exhibit frequent errors in subject-verb agreement, such as 'bussinesses may impact more', and awkward clause structures like 'reducing flights may could impact on businesses to make face-to-face interactions arre more difficult.' Punctuation and article usage also need careful attention. To improve, you should practice forming complex sentences accurately and review basic verb tense consistency and modal verb patterns.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.