Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-08
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.
Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Some people have opted to minimise the frequency of times they fly every year or stop flying with them.
In my opinion, due to this development have significant benefits to individuals and businesses as compared to environmental benefits. In this scientific age, airplanes play a very outstanding role in every aspects of life not only for individuals or businesses but for the whole world. Firstly, airplanes has capacity to fly many hours without any turbulance and covered thousand of miles with a few hours. They play a huge role to conecting peoples from one continent to another part of the world. They supply important materials related to everyday field of life like medical equipments, foods, and a lot of other things without wasting time. So flying is a reviting part of life. Airplanes also play crucial roles to countries economoy development as far social progress.Many flying companies conducted various types of planes to their fleets to strenghten collaboration to achivement.
On the other way stop or reduce flying altogether only for environmental benefits is a rediculous opinion. According to my suggestions, several other ways to adaptation of various methods which is essential for overall ecosystem. Stop or reduction of flights is not a convienent method to minimise loss. Industrilization or rapid development in human population is the biggest concerns to natural ecosystems. Moreover all types of pollution and degradation of natural boideversity is the second biggest concern to our ecosystem.
In conclusion, several adaptations may be favourable for our natural ecoystem beside to stop flying or reduced flighs.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You take a position that reducing flights is not worthwhile, and you offer relevant points about air travel’s role in connecting people, transporting medical supplies and supporting economies. However, the task asks you to weigh environmental benefits against disadvantages for individuals and businesses. The response mainly lists advantages of flying and other environmental problems; it does not explain the environmental benefits of fewer flights or compare the two sides. The final paragraph also does not clearly restate your position. To strengthen the response, explain how reduced flying could lower emissions, then weigh that benefit against specific effects on travellers and businesses, supporting each point with a clear example.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has an opening, a main discussion and a conclusion, and signposting such as “Firstly,” “Moreover” and “In conclusion” helps readers recognise some stages of the argument. However, the ideas do not progress through a clear comparison of environmental gains and personal or business costs. Several points are placed together without explaining their connection, as in the list of supplies followed by the claim that flying is “a reviting part of life.” Some linking phrases are inaccurate or awkward, including “On the other way,” and the conclusion introduces a general suggestion rather than drawing together the argument. Organise the body into focused paragraphs and use transitions that show contrast and cause and effect.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “ecosystem,” “pollution,” “degradation” and “collaboration,” and you use some relevant expressions such as “medical equipments” and “natural ecosystems.” However, the range is limited by repeated general words such as “important,” “huge” and “role,” while several inaccurate word choices or spellings make meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “reviting part of life,” “rediculous opinion,” “boideversity” and “economoy development.” Some phrases also do not fit their intended meaning, such as “conducted various types of planes to their fleets.” Build a more precise set of terms for emissions, air travel and economic effects, and check spelling and collocations before submitting.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including a sentence beginning “According to my suggestions” and one using “not only … but.” However, the range is limited, and complex attempts are often faulty. Errors in agreement and verb forms appear in “airplanes has capacity” and “They play a huge role to conecting”; other examples include “due to this development have significant benefits” and “in every aspects of life.” These patterns sometimes make the intended relationships between ideas unclear. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns, articles and plural forms, and use a few controlled complex structures to express contrast and cause. Proofread sentence boundaries and punctuation, especially where clauses run together.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.