Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-19
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.
Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
There is no doubt that reduction in number of flights will also impact on environmental factors. Everyone wants to experience the flight but it requires some protocols as well. Everonmental factors always have plus as compare to the air traffic. In further paragraphs, I will discussed the advantages of the topic.
To begin with, air traffic always have some environmental effect which damage the whole ecosystem. Increase in number of flight lead to rise the volume of air pollution. At company or business level there must be a rotation policy in which people are mangned according to their number and experience. In shape of annual international tour, companies should focus on the communication or skils trainings.
Only concernd person should be allow to deal with the international communities via air plan, rest of them should be engaged in their respective departments. Everyone should follow the modern communication way for dealing or other commercial discussion like Google Meet, Zoom etc. This approach just not only reduce the number of flight but also helpful to work in a efficient way. By doing such practices it will also help to mitigate the effect of fuel shoratge. This is not just beneficial for clean atmosphere but also significant for natural resources.
The reduction in number of flghts will also helpful for birds and other species. The sound and presence of flight also disturb the people near airport. In conclusion, there are large number of environmental benefits as compare to flights. This kind of mindset not only benefit the individually but also for the whole community.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You take a position that reducing flights brings environmental benefits, and you mention relevant effects such as air pollution, fuel use, wildlife disturbance and noise near airports. However, the task asks whether these benefits outweigh disadvantages for both individuals and businesses, and that comparison is only partly addressed. Most of the response focuses on company travel and environmental gains; disadvantages such as reduced access to travel, business costs or weaker face-to-face contact are not explored. The opening also promises advantages without clearly stating how you weigh them against the disadvantages. Develop a few relevant points with explanations or examples, and state your overall judgement directly and consistently.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has an introduction, several body paragraphs and a conclusion, so there is some basic organisation. The discussion generally moves from business travel alternatives to environmental effects, and examples such as Google Meet and Zoom help illustrate one point. However, the overall progression is not always clear: the paragraph about company rotation and training is difficult to connect to the environmental argument, and the conclusion introduces a broad claim about individual and community benefits without having developed it. Linking phrases such as “To begin with” and “In conclusion” are used, but relationships between ideas are sometimes unclear or repetitive. Organise each paragraph around one main claim and use clearer links to show cause, contrast and consequence.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “ecosystem,” “air pollution,” “commercial discussion,” “mitigate” and “natural resources.” These choices show an effort to discuss environmental and business issues, but the usable range is limited and several word choices or collocations make the meaning unclear. For example, “Everonmental factors always have plus as compare to the air traffic” does not express a clear comparison, while “in shape of annual international tour” and “fuel shoratge” are inaccurate or awkward. Spelling errors such as “mangned,” “skils” and “flghts” also reduce clarity. Build a bank of accurate topic collocations and check spelling and word forms before submitting.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You use some simple sentences and attempt longer structures, including “This approach just not only reduce the number of flight but also helpful to work in a efficient way.” However, the range remains limited, and errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction occur frequently enough to make parts difficult to follow. Examples include “I will discussed,” “air traffic always have,” “Increase in number of flight lead,” and “should be allow.” The final sentence, “not only benefit the individually but also for the whole community,” is also structurally incomplete. Practise forming accurate subject–verb patterns and parallel constructions, then check each sentence for a clear subject, verb and complete clause.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.