Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-20
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.
Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 4.5)
The number of individuals have decided to less number of times fly annually or to halt flying altogether. From my perspective, yes, the environmental pros of this development outweigh the cons for people and businesses.
Overall, the advantage of enviromental beneficial such as sustainable development and less pollution levels whereas the disadvantages is to increase the number of population rapidly.
The primary advantage of environment benefits. Nowadays, people are travelling alot due to some work or to spend holidays with their family so, they prefer aeroplane to reach their destination in a limited time. However, in the air also pollution level increases due to fuel. For Example. most of people travelling from hyderabad to delhi for some work purpose from aeroplane. but now people think that is to reduce unneccessary travelling from one place to another to less affect on environemnt. Consequently, people should do the sustainable development.
On the another hand the disadvantages on growing population. the number of individuals travel through fly due to some business work but it hardly affects on atmosphere through carbon footprints and green house gas emmissions.so, people have decided to reduce or lease flying from one place to another without distruption the envronment.
In conclusion, i strongly believe that it should be balance is to reduce the fly and people flying for some important work. Also government should take strict action to decrease the pollution level so it leass affect on global warming through sustainability and is to save for upcoming future generation.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5
You state a clear overall view in the introduction: the environmental benefits outweigh the disadvantages. You also refer to both sides, mentioning pollution from aircraft and the inconvenience of reducing flights for business travel. However, the response only partially develops the question. The claim that reducing flights would increase population is not explained and does not clearly represent a disadvantage for individuals or businesses. The Hyderabad–Delhi example illustrates air travel but does not show the consequences of flying less. Your conclusion introduces balance and government action, but the main comparison of environmental gains against practical or economic costs remains unclear. Develop relevant effects on businesses and individuals, then explain why the environmental benefits are more significant.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5
The response has an introduction, separate body paragraphs and a conclusion, so the reader can identify its broad structure. You also use signposts such as “Overall,” “On the another hand” and “In conclusion.” However, progression within and between paragraphs is often difficult to follow. The second paragraph’s point about population does not connect clearly to the stated disadvantages, while the final body paragraph shifts between business travel, emissions and reducing flights without showing how these ideas relate. Some linking phrases are used mechanically or inaccurately, and references such as “this development” are not consistently clarified. Organise each body paragraph around one relevant claim, explain it, and connect the example directly to the argument.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “carbon footprints,” “green house gas emissions,” “sustainable development” and “global warming.” These choices show awareness of environmental language, but the range is limited and several word choices or forms make the meaning unclear. For example, “the environmental pros” is informal for this essay, “less number of times” is an awkward expression, and “the disadvantages on growing population” does not communicate a clear idea. Spelling errors such as “enviromental,” “unneccessary” and “emmissions” also reduce accuracy. Build a more precise set of phrases for flight reduction, emissions, business costs and personal inconvenience, and check spelling and collocations when editing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including a contrast introduced by “However” and a cause-and-effect link with “Consequently.” Nevertheless, sentence structures are often faulty, and errors frequently make relationships between ideas hard to understand. Examples include “The number of individuals have decided,” where the subject and verb do not agree, and “the advantage of environment benefits,” which is not a complete, clear sentence. The final sentence, “i strongly believe that it should be balance,” also has an incorrect verb construction. Punctuation and capitalisation are inconsistent, particularly after full stops and around examples. Practise building accurate subject–verb sentences first, then add subordinate clauses and connectors while checking each sentence for a complete grammatical structure.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.