Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-22
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.
Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Now a days environmental problem having a controversial issue. It is often to said that reduce flying or stop flying improve our nature and environment but it also disadvantages for business and individuals. In this eassy, I will examine the topics and provide my overall opinion.
Generally speaking that, there are some environmental benefits when flying are totally off. Perhaps the main reasons why people feel that because it reduces air pollution and carbon emissions also which is most affected to our nature and create global warming when it was undercontrol. For example, Air plane are largely flow the black fuel emissions which is affected to natural air.
Secondly, there are some disadvantages for individuals when they do not take flight. Perhaps the main reason why people believed that is because when flight are off, people can not go any international travel or international work purposed, it is effect on country economy. Further, it is diffuct to meet parents and friends, that's why create distance in relationships also long distance route are need more time to reach destinations which is very surviving part speacially, suffering for old ages people.
Thirdly, there are also disadvantages for business, Perhaps the main reason why people think that is because it affect to local airlines economy, it reduces employee income and they were helpless and survived the unemployment moment and feel frustated. Further, it decreased to tourism business and huge losses for agencies. Finally, international business can hard to meeting organized.
In conclusion, this topics is a very complex issue and there are no easy solution for this.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5
You address the topic by identifying environmental benefits and disadvantages for both individuals and businesses, and your examples include travel, relationships, tourism and airline employment. However, the central question asks whether the benefits outweigh the disadvantages, and your position on this is not stated: the introduction promises an opinion, but the conclusion only calls the issue complex. As a result, the response only partially fulfils the task. Several points are also asserted rather than explained—for example, the link between reduced flying and the economy, or how businesses could adapt. State your judgement clearly in the introduction and conclusion, then compare the scale of the environmental gains with the specific costs you discuss.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for environmental benefits and two kinds of disadvantage, and a conclusion. This makes the main categories easy to identify. The sequence is generally logical, and signposts such as “Secondly,” “Thirdly,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow it. However, the repeated “Perhaps the main reason why…” construction makes the progression mechanical, and some links between ideas are unclear. For instance, the paragraph about individuals moves from international travel to relationships and then to travel time without explaining how these points connect. The conclusion also does not draw together the comparison. Use more varied transitions and develop a clear line of argument from paragraph to paragraph.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “air pollution,” “carbon emissions,” “global warming,” “tourism business,” and “unemployment,” so the reader can recognise the subject and several relevant effects. However, the range is limited and many expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, sometimes making meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “black fuel emissions,” “international work purposed,” and “surviving part,” while “environment” and “disadvantages” recur without much variation. Spelling errors such as “eassy,” “diffuct,” and “frustated” also reduce accuracy. Build a bank of precise collocations for this topic, such as “aviation emissions,” “business travel,” and “the tourism sector,” and check word forms and spelling before submitting.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including clauses introduced by “when,” “because,” and “why.” This shows an effort to express causes and consequences, but the range is limited and complex sentences are often faulty, which can make relationships between ideas hard to understand. For example, “there are some environmental benefits when flying are totally off” lacks a workable clause structure, and “it reduces employee income and they were helpless” shifts tense and does not clearly connect the ideas. There are also recurring problems with articles, agreement and sentence construction, as in “Air plane are” and “it also disadvantages.” Practise building accurate subject–verb–object sentences first, then add one subordinate clause at a time and check tense consistency.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.