Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Now a days flying by airplanes has become popular among individuals, people prefer air travels to move from one city to other city, as it not only save time but also comfortable enough. But many people believed that it has detrimental effects on environment that's why they have reduced the total numbers of flights per year or completely stopped flying altogether. in my opinion, although reducing the number of flights has beneficial impact on the environment but its also bring several challenges . In this essay i will describe both positives and negatives of this with examples.

First of all, reducing the number of flights help to reduce the air pollution which can be contributing factor for increase in earth temperature. For instance, flying an airplane burn fuel which releases gases along with smoke it along with other sources get accumulated and creates a layer over the sky which trap carbon dioxide and causes earth warming. so by lowering its use it can help to reduce this pollution.

In addition to, decrease in travel by flight also increase the local business and promote other travel means, for example, reduction in air travels direct the passengers to move by buses and other local transports which in turn can be a cause to increase in employment rates and daily income.

However, lowering the number of air travels also bring many complications, First, it increases the amount of time wasted by people who wanted to save time and reach to their destination as early as possible.an example of this is that, people has to buy tickets first and then the bus move by stopping at different stations which make it spend more time on the road as compared to air planes.

Furthermore, it will be reason to increase inconvenience for people who spent most of their time in flights because buses are congested and people sit next to each other which can create suffocation and restlessness.

to recapitulate, although decreasing air travels also decreases air pollution and increases local businesses but it also give rise to inconvenience and time consumption required to reach at the destination. In my perspective, this reduction has some positive effect on environment but it cannot completely outweigh the complications created by this so it must be used moderately but should not be stopped entirely.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the question and give a clear final position: you accept that reducing flights benefits the environment, but argue that the disadvantages mean flying should be reduced rather than stopped. The pollution point is relevant and includes an explanation of how aircraft fuel contributes to warming. You also identify time and comfort as disadvantages. However, the discussion of local businesses and employment is not clearly connected to the environmental benefits, and the claim that fewer flights will increase local business is asserted rather than supported. The disadvantages are also more fully explained than the overall environmental impact. To strengthen the response, develop the comparison directly: explain how substantial the environmental gains are and weigh them against specific effects on individuals and businesses before reaching your conclusion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for benefits and disadvantages, and a conclusion that returns to your position. Sequencing phrases such as “First of all,” “However,” and “Furthermore” help readers follow the main stages, and the examples generally appear beside the points they illustrate. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. However, several links are mechanical, and the paragraph about local business shifts away from the environmental comparison without a clear transition. Some sentences also run together, making relationships between ideas less clear. Use more precise referencing and transitions, and ensure each paragraph develops one central point that directly supports your answer.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “air pollution,” “carbon dioxide,” “employment rates,” and “inconvenience.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “detrimental effects” and “to recapitulate.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, as in “air travels,” “earth warming,” “increase the local business,” and “time consumption.” Some expressions are repeated, particularly “reduce the number of flights” and “destination,” which limits flexibility. These choices do not prevent the reader from understanding the argument, but they make parts of it less precise. Build a more reliable range of natural collocations for transport and environmental impacts, and check word forms and spelling, including “Nowadays” and “air travel.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional-style explanation of pollution and clauses introduced by “although,” “because,” and “which.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main meaning is generally understandable. However, some errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence boundaries remain. For example, “flying … help” should use a singular verb, while “people has to buy tickets” needs plural agreement. In “which trap carbon dioxide,” the verb should agree with “layer,” and several sentences begin with lowercase letters or join clauses with commas. These issues sometimes make the reader pause. Review subject–verb agreement and punctuation, then edit each sentence for complete clauses while retaining your attempts at complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.