Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.

Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In recent year, many people have started to avoid air travel to protect the environment. Although this decision has some drawbacks for people abd businesses, I believe the environmental advantage are much greater. On the one hand, flying less has clear disadvantage. For individuals, it becomes difficult to meet family living abroad or to go on holidays. For example, a student studing in canada may not be able to visit his parents in pakistan every year. For businesses, it is also a problem. Many companise need to send their employees to other countries for meeting. If they shop flying, online meeting are not always are effective as face to face meeting, and business deals can be lost. On the other hand, the environmental were the benefits of flying less are very significant. Airplanes produce a huge amount of carbon dioxide, which causes climate change and air pollution. If people fly less pollution will decrease. Secondly, this habits will encourage people to use greener transport like trains and buses. For example, in europe many people now the prefer trains instead of short flights. This not only reduces pollution but also saves natural like fu permanentsel. In my opinion, protecting our plants is the more important then personal comport. The disadvantage for individuals and businesses are temporary and can can be manage with technology like video call, but the damage to the . In conclude, although reducing flights causes some inconvension its positive effect on the environment clearly outweight the negative points.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you believe the environmental benefits outweigh the disadvantages, and you return to this view in the conclusion. You address both individuals and businesses, giving relevant examples such as students visiting family abroad and companies relying on face-to-face meetings. You also explain environmental effects through aircraft emissions and the use of trains. These points make the response relevant and cover the main parts of the question. However, some support is general or incomplete: the business disadvantage is mentioned but not explored in much detail, and the final sentence ends with an unfinished thought about environmental damage. Develop the comparison more fully by explaining why the long-term environmental gains outweigh the practical costs, and complete each supporting point clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on disadvantages, a paragraph on environmental benefits, and a conclusion. The contrastive signposts “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” help readers follow the argument, and examples generally appear beside the points they support. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical, with repeated transitions such as “For example” and “Secondly,” and some links between ideas are unclear. The environmental paragraph contains a confusing phrase (“the environmental were the benefits”), while the conclusion breaks off after “the damage to the .” This interrupts progression and makes the ending difficult to follow. Use clearer topic sentences, connect each example explicitly to the claim, and ensure that every sentence is complete.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “air travel,” “carbon dioxide,” “climate change,” “pollution,” and “face to face,” so the main ideas are usually understandable. There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “greener transport” and “business deals.” However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable and sometimes make meaning difficult to recover: “studing,” “companise,” “shop flying,” and “natural like fu permanentsel” appear in the response. Some phrases are also imprecise, including “protecting our plants” where the intended environmental reference is unclear. Build accuracy by checking spelling and choosing standard collocations, and avoid inserting a word or phrase unless you are sure it expresses the intended meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “If they shop flying…” and a relative clause in “carbon dioxide, which causes climate change.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main argument can generally be followed. However, errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction occur in several places. For example, “the environmental advantage are” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “online meeting are not always are effective” contains an incorrect plural form and duplicated verb. The conclusion also includes “can can be manage,” and the final sentence is incomplete. Review agreement and verb patterns, then proofread each sentence for a complete subject and verb. More accurate control of these forms would make your ideas easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.