Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-31
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether.
Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In recent years a few number of people want to reduce air travel every year or avoid flying together. Although this decision can create certain difficulties for people and businesses,i believe the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages.
The primary advantages of reducing air travel is that it can protect the environment from carbon emmision . Because airoplane systems make greenhouse gas which can cause environmental issues. To illustrates, people can choose another transportation such as buses and trains for travel or reach a destination .As a result this system can reduce global warming .Another reason is that aome individuals want to safe money and reduce costs . For example, air tickets are expensive for fly in many countries such as USA, Canada , UAE. If public are not travel by plane, then they can safe some of portion .
On the one hand, reducing air travel has some disadvantages. In recent days people have work or study . Studying abroad and international business can be affected by this diccission. For instance, students will not get chance to learn in overseas such as Finland , Australia and Germany. Consequently, it can give bad impact on education system. Futhermore, tourism and tourist countries economic growth can be down. visiting place will be abandoned by international tourists . For example, avoid air system destroy economy and employee would be suffer financially . As a result , visitors and economy may decrease significantly.
In conclusion, although reducing air travel may cause inconvenience to public and financial difficulties for some business, i believe that the environmental effects of the development outweigh the disadvantages.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both sides of the question and state a clear position: you believe the environmental benefits outweigh the disadvantages. Relevant points include reduced greenhouse-gas emissions and possible harm to overseas study, tourism and employment. However, some ideas are less fully explained than others. For example, the link between choosing buses or trains and reducing global warming is asserted rather than developed, while the claim that people can save money is not clearly connected to the environmental benefits being weighed. The disadvantages would also be stronger with a clearer explanation of how reduced flying affects businesses and individuals. To improve, explain each main point with a specific cause-and-effect link and keep the comparison between benefits and disadvantages central.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting benefits, a paragraph on disadvantages, and a conclusion that restates your view. This gives the reader an overall route through the argument. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow, and connectors can feel mechanical or unclear. For instance, “On the one hand” introduces the disadvantages without a corresponding “on the other hand,” and “Another reason” shifts to saving money without making its relationship to the main environmental argument clear. Some sentences are also joined or punctuated in ways that interrupt the flow. Use topic sentences that signal each paragraph’s purpose, group related points, and make links between examples and claims explicit.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “greenhouse gas,” “global warming,” “international business,” and “financial difficulties.” These terms help communicate the main ideas. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, word-form, and spelling errors make parts of the response less clear, such as “avoid flying together,” “carbon emmision,” “safe money,” and “economy can be down.” Some expressions are also imprecise, including “airplane systems make greenhouse gas.” Aim to learn topic-specific collocations and check spelling and word forms. More precise phrasing would help you explain environmental effects and economic consequences without relying on broad or awkward expressions.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a concession in the introduction (“Although this decision can create certain difficulties…”) and a conditional sentence beginning “If public are not travel by plane.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction occur across the response. Examples include “The primary advantages … is,” “people have work or study,” and “employee would be suffer financially.” Punctuation and spacing also need attention, particularly where sentences run together after full stops. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and checking verb forms, then use complex structures only when you can control them. Careful editing would make your argument easier to read.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.