Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-28
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The diagram below shows how fabric is manufactured from bamboo.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Fabric is mainly produced from bamboo. The main growth of bamboo happen in spring. After that the farmers harvest the bamboo plant during the autumn season. In which they cut the bamboo to small strips through cutter machines. then they crush the bamboo strips to make liquid pulp.
For next step bamboo farmers remove filter out the unwanted parts from the extracted liquid. In which they remove the long fibers from the liquid. After separating the long fibers from the liquid they try to soften the fibers by adding water and amine oxide with a proper ratio till it get soft and flexible. The the fibers is rotated to make yarn. It is a long, continuous strand made by twisting or spinning fibrers together. Also various color dyes are given to the thread to make colorful clothes. Then the worker weave the thread to make fabric and we get different types of clothes like shirts, pants, socks etc.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response covers the main stages of the bamboo manufacturing process, from harvesting to the final product. However, the overview is weak; it lacks a clear summary of the overall process or the key stages involved. The description is somewhat linear and descriptive rather than analytical. While the main features are identified, the response would benefit from a more structured approach that highlights the transformation from raw material to finished product more clearly. The inclusion of specific details like 'amine oxide' is good, but the overall development of the process is slightly basic.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The response is generally coherent, with a logical progression from harvesting to the final fabric. However, the paragraphing is poor; the entire body is essentially one block of text, which hinders readability. Cohesive devices are used, but they are often repetitive or mechanical, such as the frequent use of 'After that', 'In which', and 'Then'. The referencing is sometimes unclear, particularly in the second paragraph where the flow between sentences feels slightly disjointed. Improved use of linking words and better paragraph breaks would significantly enhance the clarity of the report.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to describe the process with some precision (e.g., 'liquid pulp', 'amine oxide', 'continuous strand'). However, there are instances of imprecise word choice and minor errors, such as 'The main growth of bamboo happen' (should be 'happens') and 'filter out the unwanted parts' (redundant). The range of vocabulary is somewhat limited, relying on basic verbs and nouns. To reach a higher band, the student should incorporate more varied and sophisticated terminology related to industrial processes and manufacturing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('bamboo happen', 'the fibers is rotated'), incorrect article usage, and punctuation errors. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are noticeable and occur throughout the text. The student attempts to use complex structures, but they are often marred by slips in accuracy. A greater focus on proofreading for basic grammatical consistency would be beneficial.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
