Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is?

What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The world is facing a huge problem of waste management. In recent years, many nations have not recycle the waste products as much as they could. This essay will discuss the reasons behind it and the steps can be taken by public and authorities to overcome this problem in the following paragraphs.

To commence with, the poor management of people plays a vital role for not achieving the recycling targets by the government. For instance, authorities share the information with public and recommend home owners to maintain a separate dustbins for organic and plastic waste because it helps them to differentiate and recycle the waste in an easier and smooth way. However, people totally ignore the statement and continue to mix up the garbage which later becomes a time consuming process for workers. As a result, this lack authorities to achieve their desire results.

Furthermore, there are a few steps to recycle the waste in an easier way, if both the government and public supports each other. Firstly, the government should introduce strict rule and regulations for those people who keep ignoring the warnings and continue to collect different trash in a single dustbin. Those people should be punished with a huge fine. Secondly, the government should educate people to turn recycle waste into useful products and provide subsidies to those people who desire to start recycling plants.

In conclusion, the authorities should educate people that how the waste leads to numerous problems to the environment as well as people should understand the importance of recycling and recycle the things as much as possible.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both parts of the question: you identify people’s failure to sort rubbish as a reason for low recycling, then suggest penalties, public education and subsidies for recycling plants. These ideas are relevant, and the conclusion reinforces the need for action by both authorities and the public. However, the explanation of why people do not recycle is narrower than the task allows: it focuses mainly on ignoring sorting guidance, without exploring possible causes such as inconvenience, limited facilities or lack of awareness. Some proposed actions also need fuller explanation—for example, how subsidies would lead to more recycling or how education would change household behaviour. Developing these points with a specific example would make the response more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on causes, a paragraph on solutions and a conclusion. The progression from the problem to possible remedies is easy to follow, and signposts such as “Furthermore,” “Firstly” and “Secondly” help readers identify the stages of the argument. This organisation is effective, though some linking is mechanical and the relationship between ideas is occasionally unclear. For instance, “As a result, this lack authorities to achieve their desire results” does not clearly connect the sorting problem to its consequence. The solutions paragraph also moves quickly from fines to education and subsidies. Use clearer referencing and explain the links between each cause and its corresponding solution to make cohesion more natural and precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “waste management,” “recycling targets,” “organic and plastic waste,” “subsidies” and “recycling plants.” This gives the response an adequate range for discussing the issue, and the meaning is generally understandable. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “poor management of people,” “maintain a separate dustbins,” “desire results” and “turn recycle waste into useful products.” Repetition of “waste,” “people” and “government” also limits flexibility. Aim for more natural combinations and precise forms—for example, “sort household waste,” “achieve the desired results” and “turn recycled materials into useful products.” These improvements would make your ideas clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “because,” “which” and “if.” This allows you to explain causes and consequences, and the overall meaning can usually be followed. Some grammatical errors remain, however. Examples include “many nations have not recycle” (incorrect verb form), “the steps can be taken” (missing “that”), “a separate dustbins” (article and number agreement), and “if both the government and public supports” (subject–verb agreement). There are also problems with sentence construction in “As a result, this lack authorities to achieve their desire results.” Review verb forms, articles, singular and plural agreement, and sentence completeness. More accurate control of these patterns would make your argument easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.