Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is?

What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Rubbish is very serious concern now days because it plays important role overall health of the person and health is wealth.

firstly, human being are not recycling the garbage as much as it wants to be especially people in backward region ,beacuse they are not much educated, furthermore there politician are also corrupt they are not spending much on cleaning the street ,there had not many bins in area where people can put there recycling stuff lie water bottles and soft drink cans , in todays 21st century inventor had developed so many technique where they use recycling stuff to make useful daily household decorated things and chandigarh Rock garden is one of biggest example of that, it attracts people all over the world.

Secondly, i am quite visionary in this matter to have revolutionary changes , first and foremost one need to hold protest around part of country against govermentt to compel them have more funds towards eliminate more garbage in cities like setting up the bins , where it should be written on bin its for recycyling so that individual dont mix other waste with it ,although teachers also need to educate the adults about it because they are future of the society as it says "if the base of the building is strong then building stands talk" , last and foremost as the responsible citizen of the country one need to take first step to eliminate garbage around the themself by putting them in the garbage

Recycling the garbage is really important for the human being for their health and holistic development of their nation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both questions: it identifies limited education, inadequate public facilities and weak government investment as reasons, then proposes more bins, public education and individual action. The Chandigarh Rock Garden example is relevant and helps illustrate how discarded materials can be reused. However, some points are asserted rather than explained: for instance, the link between corrupt politicians and low recycling is not developed, and the suggestion to hold protests is not clearly connected to how this would produce lasting change. The conclusion restates the importance of recycling but does not bring the proposed solutions together. To strengthen the response, explain the causes and likely effects of each solution more fully, using specific examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an opening, a paragraph on reasons, a paragraph on solutions and a brief conclusion. Sequencing words such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “first and foremost” signal the main stages. However, progression within the body paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because several ideas are joined into long, loosely connected sentences. The second paragraph, for example, moves from protests to bins, teachers, a quotation and personal responsibility without clearly showing how the points relate. Some linking phrases are repetitive or awkwardly used. Organise each body paragraph around a clear main idea, separate supporting points into sentences, and use pronouns and transitions that make the relationships between ideas explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response shows some relevant topic vocabulary, including “recycling,” “garbage,” “bins,” “household,” and “corrupt,” and the Rock Garden example gives the discussion some specificity. There are also attempts at less common or emphatic expressions, such as “holistic development” and “revolutionary changes,” but these do not always fit naturally in context. Noticeable spelling and word-choice problems—including “beacuse,” “recycyling,” “talk” for “tall,” and “eliminate garbage”—make parts of the message less clear or precise. Some phrases are also repetitive, particularly references to garbage and recycling. Build a more accurate range of collocations, such as “improve recycling rates,” “provide separate recycling bins,” and “raise public awareness,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a reason introduced by “because” and a conditional idea beginning “so that.” However, control is uneven, and some sentences become difficult to follow because clauses are joined without clear grammatical boundaries. Examples include “human being are not recycling … as much as it wants to be” and the long sentence beginning “first and foremost one need to hold protest.” There are also errors in agreement, articles and sentence punctuation, as in “there politician” and “one of biggest example.” Capitalisation of “I” and sentence openings is inconsistent. Practise building shorter, complete sentences first, then combine ideas with accurate conjunctions; check subject–verb agreement, articles and punctuation during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.