Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.
Why do you think this is?
What can be done to change this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Recycling rubbish is one of the most important step taken by the people to save environment. Some people believe that it is mandatory for everyone to recycle their rubbish in any way. While others oppose to it and spread their rubbish in the open lands. I personally believe that recycling rubbish is the need of the hour. Let us discuss the reasons followed by the solutions in the subsequent paragraphs.
To commence with, people not only consider recycling as a waste of time but also the waste of money. To elaborate, as people have less time to concentrate on extra household works, they finds it hard to collect waste and recycle it. Recycling is time consuming activity as well as it costs too much. To exemplify, the municiple counsil of my area charge Rs.500 each home if they want to get their rubbish recycled and the rubbish they collect must be more than 60kg.
Furthermore, changing is a gradual process. Government should take the initiative to collect the rubbish and recycle it. To clarify, when recycling is not a responsibility of individuals, it can be flourished easily. Moreover, the cost of recycling will be decreased when it will be done on the large scale. People do not find collecting rubbish as headache because they need not to pay anything.
In addition to it, government should make arrangements to make people aware about the consequences of collecting rubbish and not recycling it. To substantiate, the NGO's who work for the betterment of environment can play their part to make people aware. To illustrate, a survey conducted by the Green environment NGO, India, revealed that 79 percent of people of major cities agree to recycle their rubbish after the awarness propram run by the organisaton.
To conclude, recycling rubbish is essential. By making people aware about the benefits of recycling, recycling can be promoted. Government should make laws to protect environment.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both parts of the question: you identify cost and lack of time as reasons for low recycling, then propose government collection and public-awareness campaigns. Your position that recycling is important is clear, and the local council example gives one reason concrete support. However, some ideas are less fully explained than others. For instance, the claim that people “consider recycling as a waste of time” could be developed by explaining what makes sorting or transporting rubbish inconvenient. The solutions are relevant, but the link between awareness and increased recycling could be made more explicit. The opening also introduces a contrast between people who support and oppose recycling that is not clearly connected to the question. Develop each cause and solution with a clearer explanation or example to make the response more complete.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph on causes, two paragraphs on solutions, and a conclusion. The progression from practical barriers to government action and awareness is easy to follow, and signposts such as “Furthermore” and “To conclude” help guide the reader. This shows good control of the overall structure. However, several linking phrases feel formulaic or do not express the relationship precisely, including “To commence with,” “To clarify,” and “To substantiate.” The opening’s contrast between supporters and opponents is not carried through, which slightly weakens progression. Some references could also be clearer: “it” in “it can be flourished easily” does not clearly identify what will flourish. Use fewer stock transitions and make links between claims and explanations more direct.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “recycle,” “household,” “municipal council,” “consequences,” and “environment,” and the reader can understand your main points. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “take the initiative” and “play their part.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural: “spread their rubbish in the open lands,” “recycling as a waste of time,” and “collecting rubbish as headache” do not express the intended ideas naturally. Spelling errors such as “municiple,” “awarness,” and “organisaton” also reduce accuracy. Build a reliable set of recycling-related collocations and check spelling carefully; precise, natural phrasing will make your arguments more convincing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a contrast clause beginning “While others…” and conditional structures such as “when recycling is not a responsibility of individuals.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, and paragraph-level ideas remain understandable. However, some errors in agreement, articles, and verb forms recur. For example, “people … they finds” should use a plural verb, while “Recycling is time consuming activity” needs an article. The construction “the cost … will be decreased when it will be done” also uses an awkward future form after “when.” The opening fragment “While others oppose to it” is not joined effectively to the preceding sentence. Review subject–verb agreement, article use, and clauses with time expressions, and proofread sentence boundaries to improve control.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.