Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.
Why do you think this is?
What can be done to change this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
It has become increasingly common for a large number of people to throw most of their rubbish instead of reusing them. There might be several reasons, and I believe this issue can be resolved by taking some appropriate steps.
One main factor why people do not recycle their waste materials is because of lack of awareness. Most of people may not aware that how and what kind of materials could be recycled or reused. Therefore, after using certain type of things, they consider them garbage and simply throw them away. Consequently, their this attitude contribute to increage the waste on the ground, which contribute to pollute the environment.
Affordability can be another possible reason to resist people recycling rubbish. Due to consumerism, nowadays different kind of products are available in abudance. So, people can easily get them at reasonable prices, which might be more convenient for them. In contrast, recycling process can be time taking, that is why people give more preference to buy new products.
To mitigate this problem, collaboration of both goverments and common people can be helpful. Governments can raise awareness about the negative consequences of throwing rubbish through social media and organising compaigns. When people are aware, then they might be take informed decisions while shopping. In addition, if people have ideas about recycling items and also how they can recycle, they would not only show their creativity but also save their money that they can use for something important.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that people recycle waste materials in very less quantity due to lack of awareness and consumerism. I believe this issue can be tackled by adapting collaborative approach.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both parts of the question and give a clear overall position: limited awareness and consumerism are presented as causes, while government campaigns and public knowledge are proposed as solutions. The awareness point is explained through people not knowing which materials can be recycled, and the consumerism point is linked to the convenience of buying new products. However, the second cause is less fully established: affordability is named, but the explanation mainly concerns product availability and the time involved in recycling, rather than showing clearly how affordability discourages recycling. The solutions also need more specific development—for example, explain what practical recycling facilities or incentives authorities could provide and how these would change behaviour.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0
The response is organised clearly into an introduction, two paragraphs explaining causes, a paragraph on solutions, and a conclusion. The progression from reasons to remedies is easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “Therefore,” “In contrast,” and “In addition” help signal relationships between ideas. This logical structure is a strength. At times, however, connections are mechanical or references are unclear. For instance, “Consequently, their this attitude” does not refer smoothly to the preceding sentence, and “When people are aware, then” uses a somewhat formulaic link. Improve cohesion by making references precise and using transitions only where they clarify the relationship, rather than relying on a repeated cause-and-effect pattern.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “lack of awareness,” “consumerism,” “negative consequences,” and “informed decisions.” These choices make the main ideas clear, and you attempt some less common expressions. However, several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors reduce precision: “resist people recycling,” “time taking,” and “increage” are not natural or accurate forms, while “compaigns” and “goverments” are misspelled. Some phrases are also vague, such as “certain type of things” and “very less quantity.” Aim for more precise combinations, such as “discourage people from recycling,” “time-consuming,” and “a very small proportion,” and check spelling carefully. This would make your vocabulary more controlled and natural.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including cause-and-effect clauses and conditional structures, as in “if people have ideas about recycling items … they would not only show their creativity but also save their money.” Most meaning remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. Examples include “Most of people may not aware” (missing article and verb), “what kind of materials could be recycled” after “aware that,” and “their this attitude contribute” (reference, agreement, and verb form). The sentence beginning “When people are aware” also has an unnecessary “then” and an incorrect modal construction in “they might be take.” Review articles, subject–verb agreement, and modal verb patterns, then proofread complex sentences to ensure each clause is grammatically complete.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.